-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 421
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
integrate radiation field #2365
integrate radiation field #2365
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Alexander Grunewald <AlexanderGrunewald@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Andreas Flörs <afloers@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jack O'Brien <Rodot-@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Andrew Fullard <andrewgfullard@gmail.com>
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2365 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 70.53% 70.57% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 138 139 +1
Lines 12866 12875 +9
==========================================
+ Hits 9075 9087 +12
+ Misses 3791 3788 -3
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
6e3ae36
to
a76c5c4
Compare
tardis/radiation_field/base.py
Outdated
from tardis.montecarlo.montecarlo_numba.numba_interface import OpacityState | ||
|
||
|
||
class RadiationField: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we want to be clear about this being a radiationfieldstate?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sure
@andrewfullard I've included your suggestions. |
Looks like |
99fd6ec
to
aff650a
Compare
aff650a
to
5623d24
Compare
New integration of radiation field