-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added configuration of the user provider #4895
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -318,6 +318,10 @@ using the ``simple_preauth`` key: | |
simple_preauth: | ||
authenticator: apikey_authenticator | ||
|
||
providers: | ||
simple_preauth: | ||
id: your_api_key_user_provider | ||
|
||
.. code-block:: xml | ||
|
||
<!-- app/config/security.xml --> | ||
|
@@ -336,6 +340,8 @@ using the ``simple_preauth`` key: | |
> | ||
<simple-preauth authenticator="apikey_authenticator" /> | ||
</firewall> | ||
|
||
<provider name="simple_preauth" id="your_api_key_user_provider" /> | ||
</config> | ||
</srv:container> | ||
|
||
|
@@ -355,6 +361,11 @@ using the ``simple_preauth`` key: | |
), | ||
), | ||
), | ||
'providers' => array( | ||
'simple_preauth' => array( | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The change of the name is not reflect here. :) |
||
'id' => 'your_api_key_user_provider', | ||
), | ||
), | ||
)); | ||
|
||
That's it! Now, your ``ApiKeyAuthentication`` should be called at the beginning | ||
|
@@ -394,6 +405,10 @@ configuration or set it to ``false``: | |
simple_preauth: | ||
authenticator: apikey_authenticator | ||
|
||
providers: | ||
simple_preauth: | ||
id: your_api_key_user_provider | ||
|
||
.. code-block:: xml | ||
|
||
<!-- app/config/security.xml --> | ||
|
@@ -412,6 +427,8 @@ configuration or set it to ``false``: | |
> | ||
<simple-preauth authenticator="apikey_authenticator" /> | ||
</firewall> | ||
|
||
<provider name="simple_preauth" id="your_api_key_user_provider" /> | ||
</config> | ||
</srv:container> | ||
|
||
|
@@ -430,6 +447,11 @@ configuration or set it to ``false``: | |
), | ||
), | ||
), | ||
'providers' => array( | ||
'simple_preauth' => array( | ||
'id' => 'your_api_key_user_provider', | ||
), | ||
), | ||
)); | ||
|
||
Even though the token is being stored in the session, the credentials - in this | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The class behind this service would be the
ApiKeyUserProvider
class that we create in this article, right? If so, I'd like your thought on going even a bit further:Change the name from
simple_preauth
to something else, because I don't think this needs to correspond with the authentication name under the firewall (so using something else will make that obvious)Change the key used here to be something like
api_key_user_provider
After we show them the
ApiKeyUserProvider
, we just kind of link to the "custom user provider" article. What do you think about adding the service configuration below that code block and also show thesecurity.yml
configuration? I don't want to duplicate, but I feel like maybe we're leaving the user hanging without enough details.Thanks :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@weaverryan Updated as per your comments, I think adding the service makes sense. I actually had this before, but then removed it again due to the reference. But that should not be an issue to maintain.
I also changed everything to your favorite, the AppBundle.. :)