Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Basic Auth - OAuth Password Flow #3174

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

benoj
Copy link

@benoj benoj commented Jun 2, 2017

Provides ClientId/Secret in BASIC auth header and always provides user/pass in request body see #3173

benoj added 5 commits June 1, 2017 17:36
remove check on password type basic for client_id and client_secret visibility
Put client_id and secret in form data when using basic auth
Update password flow for basic auth. Set user/password in body  and set basic auth to use clientdi/secret
@webron webron requested a review from bodnia June 8, 2017 19:55
@webron
Copy link
Contributor

webron commented Jun 8, 2017

@bodnia can you please review this PR?

@bodnia
Copy link
Contributor

bodnia commented Jun 9, 2017

@benoj can you please add one more point to drop-down to cover this case?

@frol
Copy link

frol commented Jun 10, 2017

@benoj You didn't need to do this! The thing you were looking for was just named incorrectly as "Request body" type. Read more in #3227.

Please, do not merge this in until read #3227! I think this PR should be closed as the implemented functionality duplicates the existing (incorrectly named) "Request body" type.

@benoj
Copy link
Author

benoj commented Jun 14, 2017

@bodnia which case am i covering?

@shockey
Copy link
Contributor

shockey commented Feb 26, 2018

Closing in favor of @frol's assertions in #3227 - thanks for your efforts @benoj!

Happy to discuss if anyone would like to.

@shockey shockey closed this Feb 26, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants