-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Field's label text is larger than without the field plug-in #3
Comments
@amrikcooper I've tested, and the text in the field plug-in does not appear to be any larger (if anything, it is slightly less bold in web forms, but it looks the same in SurveyCTO Collect). There is small margin at the top because it is copied from the baseline-text field plug-in, but that's it. Do you have a sample form and/or screenshots demonstrating this? |
I was testing web forms only. It must be the boldness - surely that's an
undesirable addition though? Did you add boldness? Thanks.
…On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 at 22:00, Max S. Haberman ***@***.***> wrote:
@amrikcooper <https://github.com/amrikcooper> I've tested, and the text
in the field plug-in does not appear to be any larger (if anything, it is
slightly less bold in web forms, but it looks the same in SurveyCTO
Collect). There is small margin at the top because it is copied from the
baseline-text <https://github.com/surveycto/baseline-text> field plug-in,
but that's it. Do you have a sample form and/or screenshots demonstrating
this?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALPGGQV424SPGHFQC6LLCV3TXNCWVANCNFSM5AD3LRBA>
.
--
*--*
Please note: this email and its attachments (if any) may contain
confidential and privileged communication meant only for its intended
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited
from reviewing, disclosing, copying, distributing, or otherwise using
confidential materials or privileged communication. If you have received
this email in error, please notify us at ***@***.***
***@***.***>.
|
@amrikcooper The reason it looks less bold is because it is based on the baseline-text field plug-in, which has the same text style (you can test it here). Should I deviate from the baseline field plug-in, and make it a little bit more bold? Or maybe I should update the baseline field plug-ins as well? |
Ah, right, if the source is the baseline field plug-in, then I think we
should leave this. Sorry for dragging you down this path in that case.
…On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 at 23:33, Max S. Haberman ***@***.***> wrote:
@amrikcooper <https://github.com/amrikcooper> The reason it looks less
bold is because it is based on the baseline-text field plug-in, which has
the same text style (you can test it here
<https://success.surveycto.com/forms/plugin_test_form_text/designer.html?view=test&caseid=>).
Should I deviate from the baseline field plug-in, and make it a little bit
more bold? Or maybe I should update the baseline field plug-ins as well?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALPGGQQJWRGIY3UVPQBOA33TXX7CFANCNFSM5AD3LRBA>
.
--
*--*
Please note: this email and its attachments (if any) may contain
confidential and privileged communication meant only for its intended
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited
from reviewing, disclosing, copying, distributing, or otherwise using
confidential materials or privileged communication. If you have received
this email in error, please notify us at ***@***.***
***@***.***>.
|
I've noticed that this field plug-in seems to increase the size of the label text for a field. This is clear when paging between form screens that do and don't have this field plug-in. This isn't a documented feature of the plug-in, and could be undesirable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: