Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix possible segfault using SetConsVarGradient #1386

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2021
Merged

Conversation

WallyMaier
Copy link
Contributor

@WallyMaier WallyMaier commented Sep 30, 2021

Proposed Changes

I removed the calls to SetConsVarGradient in NEMO. It was causing a segfault locally when running any viscous case, though I couldn't produce the issue on other machines. If anyone has an explanation, I'm all ears! These seem to be superfluous anyway.

Related Work

This is a continuation of PR #1375

PR Checklist

Put an X by all that apply. You can fill this out after submitting the PR. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask! We want to help. These are a guide for you to know what the reviewers will be looking for in your contribution.

  • I am submitting my contribution to the develop branch.
  • My contribution generates no new compiler warnings (try with the '-Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-empty-body' compiler flags, or simply --warnlevel=2 when using meson).
  • My contribution is commented and consistent with SU2 style.
  • I have added a test case that demonstrates my contribution, if necessary.
  • I have updated appropriate documentation (Tutorials, Docs Page, config_template.cpp) , if necessary.

@@ -1591,8 +1591,6 @@ void CNEMOEulerSolver::BC_Far_Field(CGeometry *geometry, CSolver **solver_contai
/*--- Primitive variables, and gradient ---*/
visc_numerics->SetConservative(nodes->GetSolution(iPoint),
node_infty->GetSolution(0) );
visc_numerics->SetConsVarGradient(nodes->GetGradient(iPoint),
node_infty->GetGradient(0) );
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So these are unnecessary? Looks good to me otherwise, as long as this doesn't cause any issues.

Copy link
Member

@pcarruscag pcarruscag left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@pcarruscag pcarruscag merged commit 58c580b into develop Sep 30, 2021
@pcarruscag pcarruscag deleted the GradientFix_NEMO branch September 30, 2021 09:07
@pr-triage pr-triage bot added the PR: merged label Sep 30, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants