✨ Smart list filter builder

[aaronleopold]

Resolves #174

ℹ️ There are a few things in the linked issue which this PR does not cover, e.g. virtualization or sorting options baked into the config, but to trim down the project board I am marking this PR as resolving the issue. If people want this feature extended for x, y, or z, we can make a smaller-scoped feature request

I'm super excited about this one. This PR adds a proper filter builder to the UI so you can construct smart lists without having to interact with the API directly. A few other highlights besides the builder itself:

• Stepped form pattern for creating smart lists
• Rewrite schema for the create/update form(s)
• Rewrite the settings to align with other settings pages (see image below)
• Almost full translation coverage for smart list create/update pages/sections

There are a lot of changes here, though, so rather than enumerating them all I think a picture is worth a thousand words:

There are a few remaining tasks before this can go to experimental, the big one being that numeric fields are 50/50 for functionality. E.g. filtering a number field by applying a range. I'm going to prioritize getting 0.0.7 out this week, so this might not land in experimental until the following week.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 74.74747% with 25 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
apps/server/src/routers/api/v1/smart_list.rs	0.00%	16 Missing ⚠️
core/src/db/filter/smart_filter.rs	89.15%	9 Missing ⚠️

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
core/src/db/filter/smart_filter.rs	80.41% <89.15%> (ø)
apps/server/src/routers/api/v1/smart_list.rs	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

[aaronleopold]

I believe I've sorted all of the numeric issues. I've been thinking about it and I think I might just merge this in tonight, I'm excited to get it out and tested. It will also be a good buffer to have it in experimental for a few days, release 0.0.7, then promote it to nightly shortly after. So, once CI is ✅ I'll merge this

I am certain there are multiple bugs here and there, it is still an experimental feature with rough edges and that should be expected. FYI @JMicheli, if you were planning on updating the macros and pushing to this feature branch it can just be a follow-up instead. I got things compiling with your suggestions, as well, so thank you!