Fix JSON formatting issue and typos #385
Open
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
## Description
This PR resolves a JSON formatting issue and addresses multiple typos across the codebase. Below is a detailed breakdown of the changes made:
1. GroupNFT.sol
Issue:
The 'description' field in the 'tokenURI' function contained incorrect JSON formatting, which could lead to invalid JSON.
'"description": IPAsset Group",' to '"description": "IPAsset Group",'
2. IPAccountImpl.sol
Issues:
1-The word 'bethe' was a typo in a comment.
2-A missing word ('for') in a comment made it unclear.
'bethe' to 'be the'
'/// @dev Updates the IP Account's state all execute transactions.' to '/// @dev Updates the IP Account's state for all executed transactions.'
3. StorageLayoutCheck.s.sol
Issue:
'string.concat' was unnecessarily used for a single string in the 'inputBuilder.'
'inputBuilder[i++] = string.concat("@openzeppelin/upgrades-core");' to 'inputBuilder[i++] = "@openzeppelin/upgrades-core";'
Why These Changes Were Made
-To ensure valid JSON formatting for GroupNFT.
-To fix typos and improve clarity in comments for better readability.
-To remove unnecessary code and improve efficiency in StorageLayoutCheck.