Add more format based test coverage

stoplightio · Jan 16, 2020 · 59e547d · 59e547d
1 parent 43344a4
commit 59e547d
Showing 1 changed file with 73 additions and 34 deletions.
diff --git a/src/functions/__tests__/formattedEnum.test.ts b/src/functions/__tests__/formattedEnum.test.ts
@@ -51,48 +51,87 @@ describe('formattedEnum', () => {
     expect(runFormattedEnum(schema, defaultReportingThreshold)).toBeUndefined();
   });
 
-  test('should return undefined when all enum values respect the format', () => {
-    const schema = {
-      type: 'integer',
-      enum: [123, 456],
-      format: 'int64',
-    };
-
-    expect(runFormattedEnum(schema, defaultReportingThreshold)).toBeUndefined();
-  });
-
-  test('should indentify enum values that do not respect the format', () => {
-    const schema = {
-      type: 'integer',
-      enum: [123, 'a string!', 456, 'and another one!'],
-      format: 'int64',
-    };
+  describe('basic tests', () => {
+    test('should return undefined when all enum values respect the format', () => {
+      const schema = {
+        type: 'integer',
+        enum: [123, 456],
+        format: 'int64',
+      };
 
-    expect(runFormattedEnum(schema, defaultReportingThreshold)).toEqual([
-      {
-        message: 'Some enum values do not respect the specified format "int64": "a string!", "and another one!".',
-      },
-    ]);
-  });
+      expect(runFormattedEnum(schema, defaultReportingThreshold)).toBeUndefined();
+    });
 
-  test.each([
-    [1, '"a string!"...'],
-    [2, '"a string!", "and another one!"...'],
-    [3, '"a string!", "and another one!", "seriously?"...'],
-  ])(
-    'should add an ellipsis at the end of the error message when the number of invalid enum values is greater than the reporting threshold "%s"',
-    (threshold, errorMessageTrail) => {
+    test('should identify enum values that do not respect the format', () => {
       const schema = {
         type: 'integer',
-        enum: ['a string!', 'and another one!', 'seriously?', 'you must be kidding me'],
+        enum: [123, 'a string!', 456, 'and another one!'],
         format: 'int64',
       };
 
-      expect(runFormattedEnum(schema, threshold)).toEqual([
+      expect(runFormattedEnum(schema, defaultReportingThreshold)).toEqual([
         {
-          message: `Some enum values do not respect the specified format "int64": ${errorMessageTrail}`,
+          message: 'Some enum values do not respect the specified format "int64": "a string!", "and another one!".',
         },
       ]);
-    },
-  );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('formats', () => {
+    const testCases: Array<[string, string, unknown[], unknown]> = [
+      ['byte', 'string', ['SGVsbG8=', 'd29ybGQh'], 'Hello'],
+      ['int32', 'integer', [-2147483648, 17], 'Hello'],
+    ];
+
+    test.each(testCases)(
+      'does not report anything when all the definitions are valid for format "%s" of type "%s"',
+      async (format: string, type: string, valids: unknown[], invalid: unknown) => {
+        const schema = {
+          type,
+          enum: valids,
+          format,
+        };
+
+        expect(runFormattedEnum(schema, defaultReportingThreshold)).toBeUndefined();
+      },
+    );
+
+    test.each(testCases)(
+      'should identify enum values that do not respect the format "%s" of type "%s"',
+      async (format: string, type: string, valids: unknown[], invalid: unknown) => {
+        const schema = {
+          type,
+          enum: [valids[0], invalid],
+          format,
+        };
+
+        const results = runFormattedEnum(schema, defaultReportingThreshold);
+
+        expect(results[0].message).toContain(`"${invalid}"`);
+      },
+    );
+  });
+
+  describe('reporting threshold', () => {
+    test.each([
+      [1, '"a string!"...'],
+      [2, '"a string!", "and another one!"...'],
+      [3, '"a string!", "and another one!", "seriously?"...'],
+    ])(
+      'should add an ellipsis at the end of the error message when the number of invalid enum values is greater than the reporting threshold "%s"',
+      (threshold, errorMessageTrail) => {
+        const schema = {
+          type: 'integer',
+          enum: ['a string!', 'and another one!', 'seriously?', 'you must be kidding me'],
+          format: 'int64',
+        };
+
+        expect(runFormattedEnum(schema, threshold)).toEqual([
+          {
+            message: `Some enum values do not respect the specified format "int64": ${errorMessageTrail}`,
+          },
+        ]);
+      },
+    );
+  });
 });