Split SDKs into separate pages #1280
Conversation
|
Preview is available here: |
|
Tagging @ElliotFriend because I know you had some naming concerns. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Love it.
Could we change the top nav menu item so it points to the page about all SDKs? At the moment folks are dropping straight into client SDKs.
I think the page about all SDKs could also discuss the two different types there too. So that folks are dropped into a page that helps them know where to go.
|
|
||
| Each SDK has its own source code and documentation. Learn how to use a specific SDK by referring to the documentation. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Soroban Rust SDK |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we should add a section below this, ## Soroban Rust Token SDK.
It is available here: https://docs.rs/soroban-token-sdk, and is also maintained by SDF and contains utilities for building tokens and can be used in addition to the soroban-sdk.
We could add this in a follow up.
cc @sisuresh
Co-authored-by: Leigh McCulloch <351529+leighmcculloch@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Leigh McCulloch <351529+leighmcculloch@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Leigh McCulloch <351529+leighmcculloch@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Leigh McCulloch <351529+leighmcculloch@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Preview is available here: |
3 similar comments
|
Preview is available here: |
|
Preview is available here: |
|
Preview is available here: |
|
@leighmcculloch https://developers.stellar.org/docs/tools/sdks this is kind of the landing page for SDKs. Does this work for helping guide the user? |
|
Something went wrong with PR preview build please check |
Yup, that's what I was meaning, having the top nav link directly to that page where there the boxes to click through to the two. We may want to have a small blurb or image of some kind. |
|
Preview is available here: |
1 similar comment
|
Preview is available here: |
|
@leighmcculloch changes made, wdyt? |
|
Preview is available here: |
|
Looks great. I think there would be valuable in moving the BYOSDK under the Contract SDK? If there's a way to do that. |
|
Preview is available here: |
#1266