-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - Remove secretLabels
option from k8sSearch
backend
#123
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
Out of curiosity: What's the reason for removing the label selector?
Did you check that no examples for products or integration-tests use this attribute? |
It's completely redundant, since the name of the secretclass must be specified on the secrets anyway, preventing any kind of overlap.
I looked through the secret-op repo itself, but haven't searched downstream. |
https://github.com/search?q=org%3Astackabletech+secretLabels&type=code only finds matches within the secret-op repo itself. |
bors r+ |
## Description This never had any real purpose, since we always add the name of the `SecretClass` as a required label anyway.
Pull request successfully merged into main. Build succeeded: |
secretLabels
option from k8sSearch
backendsecretLabels
option from k8sSearch
backend
Thanks a lot! |
Description
This never had any real purpose, since we always add the name of the
SecretClass
as a required label anyway.Review Checklist
Once the review is done, comment
bors r+
(orbors merge
) to merge. Further information