Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unable to have a cleanup block if certain multi-assignment construction was used during the test #1352

Closed
rtretyak opened this issue Jun 22, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1333
Labels

Comments

@rtretyak
Copy link
Contributor

rtretyak commented Jun 22, 2021

Describe the bug

After updating spock version from 2.0-M5-groovy-3.0 to 2.0-groovy-3.0 one of my tests started to throw NullPointerException and prevent the project from compiling.
Note that this issue does not reproduce on 2.0-M5-groovy-3.0

Unexpected error during compilation of spec 'org.openkilda.functionaltests.spec.flows.AutoRerouteV2Spec'. Maybe you have used invalid Spock syntax? Anyway, please file a bug report at http://issues.spockframework.org.

java.lang.NullPointerException
        at org.spockframework.compiler.SpecRewriter.transformRhsExpressionIfNecessary(SpecRewriter.java:777)
        at org.spockframework.compiler.SpecRewriter.moveVariableDeclarations(SpecRewriter.java:763)
        at org.spockframework.compiler.SpecRewriter.visitCleanupBlock(SpecRewriter.java:459)
        at org.spockframework.compiler.model.CleanupBlock.accept(CleanupBlock.java:33)
        at org.spockframework.compiler.model.Method.accept(Method.java:70)
        at org.spockframework.compiler.model.Spec.accept(Spec.java:112)
        at org.spockframework.compiler.SpockTransform$Impl.processSpec(SpockTransform.java:76)
        at org.spockframework.compiler.SpockTransform$Impl.visit(SpockTransform.java:63)
        at org.spockframework.compiler.SpockTransform.visit(SpockTransform.java:48)
        at org.codehaus.groovy.transform.ASTTransformationVisitor.lambda$addPhaseOperationsForGlobalTransforms$4(ASTTransformationVisitor.java:337)
        at org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilationUnit$ISourceUnitOperation.doPhaseOperation(CompilationUnit.java:901)
        at org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilationUnit.processPhaseOperations(CompilationUnit.java:671)
        at org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilationUnit.compile(CompilationUnit.java:635)
        at org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilationUnit.compile(CompilationUnit.java:610)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.compile.ApiGroovyCompiler.execute(ApiGroovyCompiler.java:277)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.compile.ApiGroovyCompiler.execute(ApiGroovyCompiler.java:67)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.compile.GroovyCompilerFactory$DaemonSideCompiler.execute(GroovyCompilerFactory.java:98)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.compile.GroovyCompilerFactory$DaemonSideCompiler.execute(GroovyCompilerFactory.java:77)
        at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.compile.daemon.AbstractDaemonCompiler$CompilerWorkAction.execute(AbstractDaemonCompiler.java:135)
        at org.gradle.workers.internal.DefaultWorkerServer.execute(DefaultWorkerServer.java:63)
        at org.gradle.workers.internal.AbstractClassLoaderWorker$1.create(AbstractClassLoaderWorker.java:49)
        at org.gradle.workers.internal.AbstractClassLoaderWorker$1.create(AbstractClassLoaderWorker.java:43)
        at org.gradle.internal.classloader.ClassLoaderUtils.executeInClassloader(ClassLoaderUtils.java:97)
        at org.gradle.workers.internal.AbstractClassLoaderWorker.executeInClassLoader(AbstractClassLoaderWorker.java:43)
        at org.gradle.workers.internal.IsolatedClassloaderWorker.run(IsolatedClassloaderWorker.java:49)
        at org.gradle.workers.internal.IsolatedClassloaderWorker.run(IsolatedClassloaderWorker.java:30)
        at org.gradle.workers.internal.WorkerDaemonServer.run(WorkerDaemonServer.java:85)
        at org.gradle.workers.internal.WorkerDaemonServer.run(WorkerDaemonServer.java:55)
        at org.gradle.process.internal.worker.request.WorkerAction$1.call(WorkerAction.java:138)
        at org.gradle.process.internal.worker.child.WorkerLogEventListener.withWorkerLoggingProtocol(WorkerLogEventListener.java:41)
        at org.gradle.process.internal.worker.request.WorkerAction.run(WorkerAction.java:135)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
        at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ReflectionDispatch.dispatch(ReflectionDispatch.java:36)
        at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ReflectionDispatch.dispatch(ReflectionDispatch.java:24)
        at org.gradle.internal.remote.internal.hub.MessageHubBackedObjectConnection$DispatchWrapper.dispatch(MessageHubBackedObjectConnection.java:182)
        at org.gradle.internal.remote.internal.hub.MessageHubBackedObjectConnection$DispatchWrapper.dispatch(MessageHubBackedObjectConnection.java:164)
        at org.gradle.internal.remote.internal.hub.MessageHub$Handler.run(MessageHub.java:414)
        at org.gradle.internal.concurrent.ExecutorPolicy$CatchAndRecordFailures.onExecute(ExecutorPolicy.java:64)
        at org.gradle.internal.concurrent.ManagedExecutorImpl$1.run(ManagedExecutorImpl.java:48)
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
        at org.gradle.internal.concurrent.ThreadFactoryImpl$ManagedThreadRunnable.run(ThreadFactoryImpl.java:56)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)

To Reproduce

I tracked the issue down to this minimal reproducible example:

    def "test"() {
        expect:
        def (int a, int b) = getValues()
        a == 1

        cleanup:
        true
    }

    def getValues() {
        [1, 2]
    }

Environment:

Gradle 6.8, java8, spock 2.0-groovy-3.0

@rtretyak rtretyak added the bug label Jun 22, 2021
@rtretyak
Copy link
Contributor Author

looks related to #1332 and #1314

@leonard84
Copy link
Member

will be fixed with #1333

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants