-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[MRG] Upgrading command-line docs for sourmash sig
subcommands
#1714
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## latest #1714 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 84.43% 91.82% +7.38%
==========================================
Files 130 99 -31
Lines 15370 11108 -4262
Branches 2192 2192
==========================================
- Hits 12978 10200 -2778
+ Misses 2092 608 -1484
Partials 300 300
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more |
(I think you should avoid using "Fixes ..." unless it resolves the entire
issue; in this case, just use "See #1612" or something similar. Fixes
will autoclose the issue when it's merged, which we don't want.)
|
@ctb In |
Please see the documentation for argparse for what
The command-line docs are part of the sourmash documentation and can be found under |
Alright!
I'm not sure what it means to initialize the strings from the docs. |
There is existing documentation in the doc files. Copy it from there into the codebase. |
Okay, thanks! |
@ctb I have added the details for the |
looks good - does it print out helpful stuff when you do |
Thank you. Yes, I think it does. This is the output:
|
@ctb I was not able to find the command line docs for the |
I think we probably don't have any. Could you make issues to add docs for these commands? |
Sure! I'll create 2 different issues. |
@ctb I have added the required details for all the |
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 09:47:40AM -0700, Keya Barve wrote:
Sure! Should I create 2 separate issues?
Yep.
|
@ctb Please review. |
@ctb Should this PR be closed/merged? |
no, it just needs a lot of input from me, and I don't have time at the moment. No harm in leaving it open for now. |
Alright, thanks! |
notes to self for review:
|
sourmash sig
subcommandssourmash sig
subcommands
Fixes #1612
Fixes #2070
sourmash sig
subcommand that doesn't have useful output when run w/o arguments.description=__doc__
andusage=usage
argument to thesubparser.add_parser(...)
call.__doc__
andusage
strings from the command-line docs.sourmash sig
.