Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[action] [PR:16807] Adjust TSA-TSB related sonic-mgmt testcases #16961

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2025

Conversation

mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

Description of PR

Summary:
TSA-TSB service Testcases: Adjust the testcases to adhere to new behavior of config_reload

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • New Test case
  • Skipped for non-supported platforms
  • Test case improvement

Back port request

  • 202012
  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405
  • 202411

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

As a fix for the issue sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#21586, TSA-TSB service is invoked upon swss bring up(sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#21587).
This affects config_reload behavior, where after config reload the tsa-tsb service will be restarted, and the device will be in TSA state till timer expires. Adjusting the testcase to explicitly execute TSB for the DUT to be ready for next testcase,

How did you do it?

Enhanced the config_reload api to optionally take exec_tsb parameter. For startup-TSA-TSB and reliable TSA-TSB testcases, pass this flag to True to explicitly execute TSB on the device after config reload.

How did you verify/test it?

Ran the tests on t2

Any platform specific information?

NA

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

NA

Documentation

TSA-TSB service Testcases: Adjust the testcases to adhere to new behavior of config_reload
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Original PR: #16807

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld mssonicbld merged commit f888025 into sonic-net:202411 Feb 14, 2025
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants