Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Mellanox] Update Mellanox-SN5600-C256S1 SKU name and update buffers files #20703

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

noaOrMlnx
Copy link
Collaborator

@noaOrMlnx noaOrMlnx commented Nov 5, 2024

Why I did it

Update C256S1 SKU name and buffers calculations.

Work item tracking
  • Microsoft ADO (number only):

How I did it

How to verify it

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111
  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

{% set egress_lossless_pool_size = '158229504' %}
{% set egress_lossy_pool_size = '118249472' %}
{% set egress_lossy_pool_size = '115245056' %}

{% import 'buffers_defaults_objects.j2' as defs with context %}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will this config create a single lossy buffer pool?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, it will create a single egress & ingress lossy pool

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hi Noa, just to double confirm - will the lossless pool be removed?

Copy link
Contributor

@r12f r12f left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

basic cable length and buffer pool setting both looks ok. approved.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we need to update the default object file to get the right buffer pool generated?

@noaOrMlnx noaOrMlnx marked this pull request as ready for review November 14, 2024 07:27
@liat-grozovik liat-grozovik merged commit c5fd5fb into sonic-net:master Nov 14, 2024
22 checks passed
aidan-gallagher pushed a commit to aidan-gallagher/sonic-buildimage that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2024
@noaOrMlnx
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@bingwang-ms can you please help to cherry-pick to 202405?

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

Cherry-pick PR to 202405: #20966

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants