Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(ivc): impl sangria::verify in cyclefold #398

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 16, 2024
Merged

feat(ivc): impl sangria::verify in cyclefold #398

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 16, 2024

Conversation

cyphersnake
Copy link
Collaborator

Motivation
In #369 we have to fold the paired circuit with sangria

Overview
I've reused almost all fold-fn (except instance) from the existing sangria implementation

Tests will be in the next PRs

@cyphersnake
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Close #368

Copy link
Collaborator

@chaosma chaosma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what is the module "sangria_adapter.rs" trying to do?

@cyphersnake
Copy link
Collaborator Author

what is the module "sangria_adapter.rs" trying to do?

We have a sangria chip that we want to reuse here, but the interface doesn't fit one-to-one, so we make the adapter pattern

@cyphersnake cyphersnake requested a review from chaosma December 13, 2024 08:58
Base automatically changed from 369-sfc-5 to main December 16, 2024 13:37
**Motivation**
During the implementation of #369, the types for protogalaxy & cyclefold differed in form but not in substance

**Overview**
Simple refactoring with removing identical structures and using in ivc::cyclefold types from ivc::protogalaxy
**Motivation**
In #369 we have to minimize the paired circuit with sangria

**Overview**
I've reused almost all fold-fn (except `instance`) from the existing sangria implementation
@cyphersnake cyphersnake merged commit 9bf5b82 into main Dec 16, 2024
1 check passed
@cyphersnake cyphersnake deleted the 369-sfc-6 branch December 16, 2024 13:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants