Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Accepted] SDL 0035 - Audio Data Handler for SDLPerformAudioPassThru #112

Closed
pelsila opened this issue Mar 15, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@pelsila
Copy link
Contributor

pelsila commented Mar 15, 2017

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Audio Data Handler for SDLPerformAudioPassThru" begins now and runs through 3/21/2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0035-audio-pass-thru-handler.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#112

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Paul Elsila
paul@livio.io

@theresalech theresalech changed the title [In Review] SDL 0035 - Audio Data Handler for SDLPerformAudioPassThru [Accepted] SDL 0035 - Audio Data Handler for SDLPerformAudioPassThru Mar 22, 2017
@theresalech
Copy link
Contributor

There was no dissension from the Steering Committee to accept this proposal.

@theresalech
Copy link
Contributor

@smartdevicelink smartdevicelink locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 29, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants