Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update SBOM spec to indicate compat for syft #1278

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 6, 2022
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Reword SBOM wording to indicate that the formats are cosign specific
As noted by @VinodAnandan - the previous message may have caused confusion about NTIA recorgnized formats v/s formats cosign uses. Updating the wording to explicitly call out cosign supported formats.

Signed-off-by: Sambhav Kothari <skothari44@bloomberg.net>
  • Loading branch information
sambhav authored Jan 6, 2022
commit 8b55dc8fdba7c45294fe251f85d580272a845ee9
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion specs/SBOM_SPEC.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ In this example, the SBOM only refers to a single layer:

## MediaTypes

The three main SBOM formats in use are [SPDX](https://spdx.org), [CycloneDX](https://cyclonedx.org/) and [syft](https://github.com/anchore/syft).
The SBOM formats supported by cosign are [SPDX](https://spdx.org), [CycloneDX](https://cyclonedx.org/) and [syft](https://github.com/anchore/syft).
The `mediaTypes` for these should be indicated in the `descriptor` for each `layer`.

The `mediaTypes` are:
Expand Down