-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 809
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - Remove build status badge from README #3195
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I agree it's unnecessary to highlight the spurious failures in the README 😅
I think we'll still be motivated to fix them by the failed Bors builds too.
If you want to batch this PR, might I suggest batching it with #3192, else Clippy will fail |
I was just about to comment on the irony of this PR failing CI 😅 |
I'm reviewing #3168 now, I suspect I'll approve shortly. Perhaps we can triple batch 🤤 |
bors r+ |
## Issue Addressed Removes the build status badge from the main README.md. I don't think it actually serves a purpose and it also has the downside that a spurious failure gives us a red badge. For example, v2.2.1 failed with a [spurious failure](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/runs/5984392665?check_suite_focus=true) and I can't see a way to re-trigger that run. It will be red until our next release. The same test suite runs when we merge into `unstable`, so those tests must have already passed in order for the commits to get onto `stable` (assuming our workflow is followed). Github will send notifications on failed CI, so we'll still be alerted to a failure without checking this badge.
Build failed (retrying...): |
## Issue Addressed Removes the build status badge from the main README.md. I don't think it actually serves a purpose and it also has the downside that a spurious failure gives us a red badge. For example, v2.2.1 failed with a [spurious failure](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/runs/5984392665?check_suite_focus=true) and I can't see a way to re-trigger that run. It will be red until our next release. The same test suite runs when we merge into `unstable`, so those tests must have already passed in order for the commits to get onto `stable` (assuming our workflow is followed). Github will send notifications on failed CI, so we'll still be alerted to a failure without checking this badge.
Build failed (retrying...): |
bors r- gotta fix udeps |
Canceled. |
LFG bors r+ |
## Issue Addressed Removes the build status badge from the main README.md. I don't think it actually serves a purpose and it also has the downside that a spurious failure gives us a red badge. For example, v2.2.1 failed with a [spurious failure](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/runs/5984392665?check_suite_focus=true) and I can't see a way to re-trigger that run. It will be red until our next release. The same test suite runs when we merge into `unstable`, so those tests must have already passed in order for the commits to get onto `stable` (assuming our workflow is followed). Github will send notifications on failed CI, so we'll still be alerted to a failure without checking this badge.
Issue Addressed
Removes the build status badge from the main README.md. I don't think it actually serves a purpose and it also has the downside that a spurious failure gives us a red badge. For example, v2.2.1 failed with a spurious failure and I can't see a way to re-trigger that run. It will be red until our next release.
The same test suite runs when we merge into
unstable
, so those tests must have already passed in order for the commits to get ontostable
(assuming our workflow is followed). Github will send notifications on failed CI, so we'll still be alerted to a failure without checking this badge.