Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
changed split to aligned
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
tfmlaX authored May 15, 2024
1 parent 14fc192 commit 244c0bb
Showing 1 changed file with 8 additions and 8 deletions.
16 changes: 8 additions & 8 deletions docs/src/examples/anderson-model.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -21,17 +21,17 @@ We remark that this is the same Bogoliubov transformation used in the thermofiel
The thermofield-transformed Hamiltonian is then mapped on two chains, defined and constructed using the TEDOPA chain mapping: the chain labelled $1$ is for the empty modes, the chain labelled $2$ for the filled modes.
The following relations are used to define the functions equivalent to the spectral density of the bosonic case, one for each chain:
```math
\begin{split}
\begin{align}
&V_{1k} = V_{k} \sin \theta_k = \sqrt{\frac{1}{e^{\beta \epsilon_k}+1}} \\
&V_{2k} = V_{k} \cos \theta_k = \sqrt{\frac{1}{e^{-\beta \epsilon_k}+1}},
\end{split}
\end{align}
```
where we choose the spectral function that characterizes the fermionic bath to be: $V_k= \sqrt{1-k^2}$, and we define the dispersion relation as: $e_k = k$, that is, a linear dispersion relation with propagation speed equal to $1$. This latter choice corresponds to a model of metals (gapless energy spectrum). We select a filled state as the initial state of the defect.
Using the mapping proposed in [1], the chain Hamiltonian becomes:
```math
\begin{split}
\begin{aligned}
\hat H^\text{chain} = \hat H_\text{loc} &+ \sum_{i = \{1,2\}}\bigg[ J_{i,0} \Big(\hat d^\dagger \hat a_{i,0} + \hat d \hat a_{i,0}^\dagger \Big) + \\ &+ \sum_{n=1}^\infty \Big( J_{i,n} \hat a_{i,n}^\dagger \hat a_{i,n-1} + J_{i,n} \hat a_{i,n-1}^\dagger \hat a_{i,n} \Big) + \sum_{n=0}^\infty E_{i,n} \hat a_{i,n}^\dagger \hat a_{i,n} \bigg],
\end{split}
\end{aligned}
```
where the $J_{i,n}$ coefficients are the couplings between the chain sites and the $E_{i,n}$ coefficients are the energies associated to each chain site. Clearly, the interactions are between nearest neighbors. This, combined with the fact that the fermions in our model are spinless, enables a straightforward mapping into fermionic operators of the bosonic creation and annihilation operators, that on their part obey to the bosonic commutation relations: $[\hat b_i, \hat b_j^\dagger] = \delta_{ij}$, $[\hat b_i, \hat b_j] =[\hat b_i^\dagger, \hat b_j^\dagger] =0$ $\forall i,j$. The mapping derived from Jordan-Wigner transformations for spinless fermions is:
```math
Expand All @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ We can represent the Hamiltonian $\hat H^\text{chain}$ as a MPOs bond dimension
```
where the matrices are defined as:
```math
\begin{split}
\begin{aligned}
& W_{1N} =
\begin{bmatrix}
\hat{\mathbb I} & J_{2,N} \hat b_{2,N}^\dagger & J_{2,N} \hat b_{2,N} & E_{2,N} \hat b_{2,N}^\dagger \hat b_{2,N}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ where the matrices are defined as:
\begin{bmatrix}
E_{2,N} \hat b_{2,N}^\dagger \hat b_{2,N} \\ J_{2,N} \hat b_{2,N} \\ J_{2,N} \hat b_{2,N}^\dagger \\ \hat{\mathbb I}
\end{bmatrix}.
\end{split}
\end{aligned}
```

### Interleaved chain MPO
Expand All @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ where the string operator $\hat F_i$ is defined as: $\hat F_i = (-1)^{\hat n_i}
where the matrices are defined as:

```math
\begin{split}
\begin{aligned}
& W_d =
\begin{bmatrix}
\hat{\mathbb I} & \hat d & \hat d^\dagger & 0 & 0 & E_{d} \hat d^\dagger \hat d
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ where the matrices are defined as:
\begin{bmatrix}
E_{1,N} \hat b_{1,N}^\dagger \hat b_{1,N} \\ 0 \\0 \\ J_{1,N} \hat b_{1,N}^\dagger \\ J_{1,N} \hat b_{1,N} \\ \hat{\mathbb I}
\end{bmatrix} .
\end{split}
\end{aligned}
```

## Code implementation
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 244c0bb

Please sign in to comment.