Support for UFDR generated by Physical Analyzer Ultra (version 8.x)

[aberenguel]

Does IPED support UFDR files generated by PA Ultra (version 8.x)?

I've seen that the structure of files are a little bit different. See the files inside the UFDR files bellow (omitting "chats" and "files" directories).

PA version 7.65

Archive:  teste-PA-7.ufdr
  Length      Date    Time    Name
---------  ---------- -----   ----
     2622  2023-12-15 16:25   email/agenda_icon.png
     1142  2023-12-15 16:25   email/calendar_icon.png
     1230  2023-12-15 16:25   email/clock_icon.png
1951515832  2023-12-15 16:25   report.xml
 57352192  2023-12-15 16:25   ThumbnailCache.s3db
---------                     -------

PA version 8.8

Archive:  teste-PA-8.ufdr
  Length      Date    Time    Name
---------  ---------- -----   ----
    16384  2023-12-15 20:36   ThumbnailCache.s3db
1885396348  2023-12-15 20:49   DbData/database.db
     1966  2023-12-15 20:49   DbData/database.json
2056197162  2023-12-15 20:50   report.xml
---------                     -------

The main difference is that the PA 8.x added some data in the folder DbData.

The file DbData/database.db is a PostgreSQL custom database dump. I wonder if data inside the dump are redundant with data inside report.xml.

The file DbData/database.json has some case information as "Case number", "Examiner name", "Crime type" and "Department".

[wladimirleite]

There are some users here already using PA 8, and processing the generated UFDR with IPED. So I think this issue should have some priority, at least to check possible issues in more detail and handle simple differences (from version 7) that may exist.

[lfcnassif]

@patrickdalla, since you are working on this, I'm assigning it to you to let others know and avoid duplicate efforts.

[lfcnassif]

Is there any other known incompatibility other than #2149 or may this be closed?

[patrickdalla]

For the cases I processed, it worked as expected, i could not find other new issue. I think this could be closed as it does not points any specific issue. Em sex., 3 de mai. de 2024, 12:53, Luis Filipe Nassif < ***@***.***> escreveu:

…

Is there any other known incompatibility other than #2149 <#2149> or may this be closed? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2028 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG247S6ZBOUVUIC27ED7ECLZAO6HLAVCNFSM6AAAAABA4GBPB2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAOJTGM4TENZUGI> . You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[lfcnassif]

Thanks @patrickdalla! So I'm closing this. If anyone finds another incompatibility, please reopen.