Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add CD74HC4057 input #102

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 28, 2024
Merged

feat: add CD74HC4057 input #102

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 28, 2024

Conversation

leon0399
Copy link
Member

Closes #68

Copy link
Contributor

sweep-ai bot commented Feb 27, 2024

Apply Sweep Rules to your PR?

  • Apply: All docstrings and comments should be up to date.
  • Apply: There should be no trailing whitespace in the code.
  • Apply: There should be no commented-out code in the codebase.
  • Apply: Variable names should be descriptive and follow a consistent naming convention.
  • Apply: There should be no unnecessary blank lines in the code.
  • Apply: There should be no unused imports in the code.

This is an automated message generated by Sweep AI.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2024

Codecov Report

Merging #102 (e2277d8) into develop (41ae1ec) will increase coverage by 0.07%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #102      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    44.75%   44.82%   +0.07%     
===========================================
  Files           42       42              
  Lines         1200     1198       -2     
===========================================
  Hits           537      537              
+ Misses         663      661       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 44.82% <0.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@leon0399 leon0399 force-pushed the feature/cd74hc4067 branch 2 times, most recently from 31aa798 to 5131d3c Compare February 28, 2024 07:46
@leon0399
Copy link
Member Author

@CodiumAI-Agent /describe --pr_description.add_original_user_description=true --pr_description.keep_original_user_title=true

@leon0399
Copy link
Member Author

@CodiumAI-Agent /review --pr_reviewer.num_code_suggestions=0

@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: The main theme of this PR is to add support for the CD74HC4057 analog multiplexer/demultiplexer to the SenseShift library.
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR introduces a new class, CD74HC4057Component, to handle the initialization and channel selection of the CD74HC4057 component. It also introduces a new sensor class, CD74HC4057Sensor, that extends the existing AnalogSimpleSensor class. The PR also modifies the AnalogSimpleSensor class to make the pin_ member constant and add a MAX_VALUE constant.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 3, because the PR introduces new classes and modifies existing ones, but the changes are straightforward and well-documented.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No

PR Feedback

💡 General suggestions: The code is generally well-written and easy to understand. However, there are a few areas that could be improved:

  1. It would be beneficial to add some error handling or assertions to ensure that the channel parameter passed to the selectChannel method is within the valid range.
  2. The CD74HC4057Sensor class could benefit from a destructor that ensures the component_ pointer is properly cleaned up to prevent memory leaks.
  3. It would be helpful to add comments to the getValue method in the CD74HC4057Sensor class to explain the logic behind the method.

✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...
Utilizing extra instructions

The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_reviewer] # /review #
extra_instructions="""
In the code feedback section, emphasize the following:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation
  • When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
pr_commands = ["/review", ...]

meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

About the 'Code feedback' section

The review tool provides several type of feedbacks, one of them is code suggestions.
If you are interested only in the code suggestions, it is recommended to use the improve feature instead, since it dedicated only to code suggestions, and usually gives better results.
Use the review tool if you want to get a more comprehensive feedback, which includes code suggestions as well.

Auto-labels

The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:

  • a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
  • a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
Extra sub-tools

The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example:
require_score_review, require_soc2_review, enable_review_labels_effort, and more.

More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

PR Review

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

3, because the PR introduces a new component (CD74HC4057) with a significant amount of new code, including initialization and channel selection logic. The complexity is moderate, requiring a detailed review of the implementation logic and its integration with existing code.

🧪 Relevant tests

No

🔍 Possible issues

The selectChannel method in CD74HC4057Component does not handle invalid channel numbers, which could lead to unexpected behavior if an out-of-range channel is selected.

The init method in CD74HC4057Sensor only calls this->component_->init(); without initializing the SIG pin used by the AnalogSimpleSensor. This might be intentional, assuming the component initialization covers it, but it could lead to confusion or errors if the SIG pin requires explicit initialization.

The use of delayMicroseconds in selectChannel for switching delay might introduce latency issues in time-sensitive applications. It's worth considering if there's a more efficient way to handle the switching delay.

🔒 Security concerns

No


✨ Review tool usage guide:

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...
Utilizing extra instructions

The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_reviewer] # /review #
extra_instructions="""
In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation
  • When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
pr_commands = ["/review", ...]

meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

Auto-labels

The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:

  • a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
  • a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
Extra sub-tools

The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example:
require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, and more.

Auto-approve PRs

By invoking:

/review auto_approve

The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval.

To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following:

[pr_reviewer]
enable_auto_approval = true

(this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository)

You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the estimated_review_effort is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag:

[pr_reviewer]
maximal_review_effort = 5
More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

@leon0399 leon0399 force-pushed the feature/cd74hc4067 branch 3 times, most recently from 5eaaa79 to 607d79e Compare February 28, 2024 14:46
@leon0399 leon0399 merged commit b2249d7 into develop Feb 28, 2024
40 of 41 checks passed
@leon0399 leon0399 deleted the feature/cd74hc4067 branch February 28, 2024 16:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants