Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: set code tx support #1600

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

colinlyguo
Copy link
Member

@colinlyguo colinlyguo commented Feb 20, 2025

Purpose or design rationale of this PR

PR title

Your PR title must follow conventional commits (as we are doing squash merge for each PR), so it must start with one of the following types:

  • feat: A new feature

Deployment tag versioning

Has tag in common/version.go been updated or have you added bump-version label to this PR?

  • Yes

Breaking change label

Does this PR have the breaking-change label?

  • No, this PR is not a breaking change

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the application release version to v4.4.88 for improved stability.
    • Streamlined dependency management to bolster system compatibility.
  • Refactor
    • Optimized package usage, leading to a clearer approach for fee handling.
  • New Features
    • Expanded transaction processing by incorporating additional authorization details.

@colinlyguo colinlyguo added the bump-version Bump the version tag for deployment label Feb 20, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 20, 2025

Walkthrough

This PR updates the version number from "v4.4.87" to "v4.4.88" in the version file. It modifies the dependency list in the rollup module by adding, updating, and removing several packages. Additionally, the PR refines import statements in the sender and watcher components—shifting from a specific eip4844 import to a more general misc package—and enhances the TransactionData structure in the l2 watcher by adding a new AuthorizationList field.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
common/version/version.go Updated version tag from "v4.4.87" to "v4.4.88".
rollup/go.mod Added new dependencies (e.g., github.com/edsrzf/mmap-go v1.0.0, github.com/google/go-cmp v0.6.0, etc.), updated existing ones (e.g., github.com/scroll-tech/da-codec from v0.1.2 to v0.1.3-0.20250210041951-d028c537b995, github.com/scroll-tech/go-ethereum from v1.10.14-0.20241023093931-91c2f9c27f4d to v1.10.14-0.20250220125731-2dde0c79d2a1, github.com/deckarep/golang-set from v2.1.0 to v1.8.0), and removed several indirect dependencies (e.g., various cockroachdb packages, sentry-go, flock, etc.).
rollup/internal/controller/sender/sender.go
rollup/internal/controller/watcher/l1_watcher.go
Modified the import statements: replaced the specific eip4844 import with a general misc package. In l1_watcher.go, also updated the blob fee calculation logic to use misc.CalcBlobFee(*excess) instead of eip4844.CalcBlobFee(*excess).
rollup/internal/controller/watcher/l2_watcher.go Added a new field AuthorizationList to the TransactionData structure, which is populated by calling tx.SetCodeAuthorizations() within the txsToTxsData function.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • georgehao
  • Thegaram

Poem

Hop along, code is on its way,
Version tag hops to a brand new day.
Dependencies join the playful dance,
Imports shift with a nimble prance.
New fields grow under the moon’s glow,
I'm a bunny coder, watch my changes flow!
🐰✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 55e926b and cd24e2c.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • rollup/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rollup/go.mod (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • rollup/go.mod
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: tests
  • GitHub Check: tests

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@colinlyguo colinlyguo changed the title feat: support set code transaction feat: set code tx support Feb 20, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c07975a and 58c0e8e.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • go.work.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
  • rollup/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • common/version/version.go (1 hunks)
  • rollup/go.mod (4 hunks)
  • rollup/internal/controller/sender/sender.go (1 hunks)
  • rollup/internal/controller/watcher/l1_watcher.go (1 hunks)
  • rollup/internal/controller/watcher/l2_watcher.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • rollup/internal/controller/sender/sender.go
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
rollup/internal/controller/watcher/l1_watcher.go

8-8: "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/consensus/misc" imported and not used

(typecheck)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
common/version/version.go (1)

8-8: LGTM: Version increment for new feature.

Version bump from v4.4.87 to v4.4.88 aligns with the addition of set code transaction support.

rollup/internal/controller/watcher/l2_watcher.go (1)

103-121: LGTM: Added authorization list support.

The addition of AuthorizationList field and its initialization using SetCodeAuthorizations() properly implements the set code transaction support.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 10.52632% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 51.72%. Comparing base (a6f2457) to head (cd24e2c).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
rollup/internal/controller/watcher/l2_watcher.go 0.00% 17 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1600      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    51.72%   51.72%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          157      157              
  Lines        12555    12556       +1     
===========================================
  Hits          6494     6494              
- Misses        5497     5498       +1     
  Partials       564      564              
Flag Coverage Δ
rollup 56.98% <10.52%> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@jonastheis jonastheis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think would be better to merge it into #1583 once scroll-tech/da-codec#43 is merged as well

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bump-version Bump the version tag for deployment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants