Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⬆️ Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v2.2.0 #65

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 15, 2019

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 2, 2019

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin devDependencies minor 2.0.0 -> 2.2.0
@typescript-eslint/parser devDependencies minor 2.0.0 -> 2.2.0

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint

v2.2.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [efrt] allowExpressions - check functions in class field properties (#​952) (f1059d8)
  • eslint-plugin: [expl-member-a11y] fix parameter properties (#​912) (ccb98d8)
  • eslint-plugin: [prefer-readonly] add handling for destructuring assignments (e011e90)
Features
  • eslint-plugin: add brace-style extension (e01dc5f)

v2.1.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [efrt] allowExpressions - check functions in class field properties (#​952) (f1059d8)
  • eslint-plugin: [expl-member-a11y] fix parameter properties (#​912) (ccb98d8)
  • eslint-plugin: [prefer-readonly] add handling for destructuring assignments (e011e90)
Features
  • eslint-plugin: add brace-style extension (e01dc5f)

Renovate configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻️ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or if you modify the PR title to begin with "rebase!".

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot added the renovate label Sep 2, 2019
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Sep 2, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #65 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #65   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    87.5%   87.5%           
======================================
  Files           1       1           
  Lines           8       8           
  Branches        1       1           
======================================
  Hits            7       7           
  Partials        1       1

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6413ec6...a38be3b. Read the comment docs.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from b05cab3 to a38be3b Compare September 5, 2019 06:31
@renovate renovate bot changed the title ⬆️ Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v2.1.0 ⬆️ Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v2.1.0 Sep 5, 2019
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from a38be3b to b04b3c7 Compare September 9, 2019 17:06
@renovate renovate bot changed the title ⬆️ Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v2.1.0 ⬆️ Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v2.2.0 Sep 9, 2019
@renovate renovate bot changed the title ⬆️ Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v2.2.0 ⬆️ Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v2.2.0 Sep 9, 2019
@screendriver screendriver merged commit d17e956 into master Sep 15, 2019
@screendriver screendriver deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch September 15, 2019 19:28
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 7, 2020

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.0.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants