Make sure neutron, proton and their anti-particles compare equal

[maxnoe]

I added two dicts that are build at import time, one mapping one pdgid to the alternative representation to implement the comparison and one with the "preferred" pdgid used for __hash__ and to make from_name work and always return the same pdgid.

I chose the "bag of quarks" ids for the "preferred" options, for no particular reason.

Edit: that's actually the official recommendation:

To avoid ambiguities, nuclear codes should not be applied to a single hadron, like p, n or Λ0, where quark-contents-based codes already exist.

From that I infer though, that neutron and proton are not the only cases, also the delta resonance at least.

Closes #620.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.20%. Comparing base (4f8e0cb) to head (bb574cc).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #622      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.07%   96.20%   +0.13%     
==========================================
  Files          32       32              
  Lines        1324     1343      +19     
==========================================
+ Hits         1272     1292      +20     
+ Misses         52       51       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[eduardo-rodrigues]

Thanks very much @maxnoe for the speedy action 👍! I've got something urgent to finish today but will get back to this really soon.

I hope this also handles the feature #620.

Oh, I see you got those quotes from the docstring for nuclei, which I probably got from somewhere such as periodictable when including the nuclei. It would be easier if no nucleus codes existed for the proton and neutron, but ...

Indeed the scheme can also handle hypernuclei with a p or n being replaced by a Lambda. Some are known, and for example have been studied by ALICE and LHCb :-).

[maxnoe]

I hope this also handles the feature #620.

Yes, see the tests

[eduardo-rodrigues]

Many thanks for this great PR. I believe you are done, but kindly confirm and I will merge. Thank you 👍!

Closes #620.

[maxnoe]

Yes, from my side this is ready

[eduardo-rodrigues]

Thank you again.

[eduardo-rodrigues]

@all-contributors please add @maxnoe for code

[allcontributors]

@eduardo-rodrigues

I've put up a pull request to add @maxnoe! 🎉