We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Python docstrings
In the example given, the result type is the same as the input type:
Simplifies unions of records, e.g. >>> array = ak.Array([{"a": 1}, {"b": 2}]) into records of options, i.e. >>> ak.merge_union_of_records(array) <Array [{a: 1, b: None}, {a: None, ...}] type='2 * {a: ?int64, b: ?int64}'>
>>> import awkward as ak >>> ak.Array([{"a": 1}, {"b": 2}]).type.show() 2 * { a: ?int64, b: ?int64 } >>> ak.merge_union_of_records(ak.Array([{"a": 1}, {"b": 2}])).type.show() 2 * { a: ?int64, b: ?int64 }
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Gah, this is the reason for doctests. I made a last minute change here. Thanks for catching it!
Sorry, something went wrong.
merge_union_of_records
agoose77
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Which documentation?
Python docstrings
What needs to be documented?
In the example given, the result type is the same as the input type:
Quote from the docstring
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: