-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Django 1.5 support #143
Comments
When will it be available ? |
The plan is to finish this with the next release (shown above as milestone 0.1.9) which should be out within a month. If I get enough community contribution, it could go out earlier. This is a great issue to work on for new contributors. |
OK, thanks. |
For anyone interested in getting this closed faster- I've started a campaign to fund the completion of this release, including 1.5+ support. Check it out at https://www.bountysource.com/fundraisers/423-neo4django-0-1-9 |
If I use neo4django right now with Django 1.5.1, what are the incompatibility issues that arise? Is it still usable in some aspects? |
Auth and admin almost certainly won't work, and there's no Python 3 support. I'm not sure beyond that- since we don't have 1.5+ specific tests, I can't say. Anecdotally I know some folks are trying it against 1.5, but I haven't heard back. If you do run it with 1.5.1 I'd love to know any issues you run into. |
The bountysource campaign has closed, is there any other way to contribute? |
Absolutely- I have a Gittip account as well that funds neo4django dev- https://www.gittip.com/mhluongo/ . Thanks for thinking to support the project! |
@rthuffman you can also crowdfund bounties on specific issues :) https://www.bountysource.com/trackers/207361-scholrly-neo4django |
any news on this? |
I'll be sprinting on this next week at the Neo4j office- I should have an update by Thursday. This is at the top of my list. If you have any spare cycles, I could use someone testing against Django 1.5+- user-swappable models and aspects of the admin might not work, but it would be really helpful to know if anything else crops up. @pqn sounded interested but I haven't heard back. |
I have college apps at the moment, but if time crops up I'll let you know. ;) |
For now I can say a simple
gives:
But Activity is not abstract. |
A quick update: the entire test suite passes on my machine with Django 1.5.4. I'm working on swappable user models now. After that, I could really use some testers :) @tonjo I can't replicate the issue you're having... could you |
In github I see there is still
while the failing test was on
Anyway, my pip freeze:
|
@tonjo So- you aren't testing against Django 1.5? When did you have the "Activity is abstract" error? I realize you have another test you're having trouble with, but that's a different issue (this is about Django 1.5 support). |
Yes, sorry, wrong issue I'm talking about. I got back to 1.4.8 or I couldn't go on, |
Heh I understand. I just replicated the other issue, but I'm not seeing any against 1.5 :) |
Reinstalled now all the enviroment but I got the same "Activity is abstract" error. |
re: the "egg" command line argument - They are the same package- the distinction has to do with the versioning within the environment, not the source package version. Hm, I can't replicate the "abstract" error at all. What happens when you run the test suite ( |
I'm happy to say it was not an environment's issue, but my fault. |
shwew, excellent! Everyone please feel free to use Django 1.5 with HEAD. I'm still working on swappable |
Now I'm wondering why I didn't have the same errors with 1.4.8, some behavior changes? Note:
|
Yeah, I'm familiar with that deprecation warning- it should probably be raised as an issue, though it's not high priority. |
I'm closing this issue- it's been a month since swappable user model support and it looks like the minor issues have been ironed out. |
I don't agree ;) |
Absolutely right @tonjo, merging it in. |
Taken care of. Anyone else have objections to closing this / outstanding issues with 1.5? |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: