Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #176: Add Paradox directive to show binding build tool integration #186

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2018

Conversation

jonas
Copy link
Member

@jonas jonas commented Sep 4, 2018

screen shot 2018-09-03 at 22 46 14

screen shot 2018-09-03 at 22 46 21

screen shot 2018-09-03 at 22 46 27


def renderBindingDependency(binding: String, printer: Printer): Unit = {
val artifactName = s"lib$binding"
val artifactId = s"${artifactName}_native0.3_${ScalaBinaryVersion}"
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

native0.3 is currently hard-coded. I don't know if it is possible to get it from the sbt-scala-native plugin.

@jonas jonas force-pushed the binding-artifact-id branch from 2ecadf1 to 2118de1 Compare September 4, 2018 02:50
@jonas jonas requested a review from kornilova203 September 4, 2018 02:50
@jonas jonas force-pushed the binding-artifact-id branch from 2118de1 to 0351ff5 Compare September 4, 2018 04:54
Copy link
Member

@kornilova203 kornilova203 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome

artifact="libiconv_$scala.binary.version$"
version="$project.version$"
}
@@binding[iconv]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❤️

@kornilova203
Copy link
Member

Closes #176

@kornilova203 kornilova203 merged commit c42019e into master Sep 7, 2018
@kornilova203 kornilova203 deleted the binding-artifact-id branch September 7, 2018 19:16
@jonas
Copy link
Member Author

jonas commented Sep 7, 2018

Thanks for the review, I will work on releasing version 0.3.1.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants