some work on application of zorn's lemma

StoneDuality/Boolean.lean

@@ -599,10 +599,7 @@ lemma etaObjObjSet_orderemb {A : BoolAlg} (a b : A) (hle : etaObjObjSet a ⊆ et
     BoolAlg.coe_toBddDistLat, BoolAlg.coe_of, SupHom.toFun_eq_coe, LatticeHom.coe_toSupHom,
     BoundedLatticeHom.coe_toLatticeHom, eq_iff_iff, Set.setOf_subset_setOf, Prop.top_eq_true,
     iff_true] at hle
-
-
-
-
+  -- TODO this is where we need the prime ideal theorem for distributive lattices!
   sorry
 
 

StoneDuality/PIT.lean

@@ -22,27 +22,63 @@ ideal, filter, prime, distributive lattice
 
 -/
 
-variable (α : Type*) [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α]
+namespace DistribLattice
+
+variable  [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α]
 
 open Order Ideal Set
 
-theorem prime_ideal_of_disjoint_filter_ideal (F : PFilter α) (I : Ideal α)
+
+variable {F : PFilter α} {I : Ideal α}
+
+/-- A union of a chain of ideals of sets is an ideal. -/
+lemma IsIdeal_sUnion_chain (C : Set (Set α)) (hidl : ∀ I ∈ C, IsIdeal I) (hC : IsChain (· ⊆ ·) C) :
+  IsIdeal C.sUnion := by sorry
+
+
+theorem prime_ideal_of_disjoint_filter_ideal
+  (F : PFilter α) (I : Ideal α)
   (hFI : Disjoint (F : Set α) (I : Set α)) :
-  ∃ J : Ideal α, (IsPrime J) ∧ I ≤ J ∧ (J : Set α) ∩ F = ∅ := by
-  set S : Set (Set α) := fun J ↦ IsIdeal J ∧ ⊤ ∉ J ∧ I ≤ J ∧ (J : Set α) ∩ F = ∅
+  ∃ J : Ideal α, (IsPrime J) ∧ I ≤ J ∧ Disjoint (F : Set α) J := by
+
+  -- Let S be the set of proper ideals containing I and disjoint from F
+  set S : Set (Set α) := { J : Set α | IsIdeal J ∧ ⊤ ∉ J ∧ I ≤ J ∧ Disjoint (F : Set α) J }
+
+  -- Then I is in S...
+  have IinS : ↑I ∈ S := by
+    refine ⟨Order.Ideal.isIdeal I,
+    ⟨fun h ↦ Set.Nonempty.not_disjoint ⟨⊤, ⟨Order.PFilter.top_mem, h⟩⟩ hFI, by trivial⟩⟩
 
-  have chainub : ∀ c ⊆ S, IsChain (· ⊆ ·) c → ∃ ub ∈ S, ∀ s ∈ c, s ⊆ ub := by sorry
-  have zorn := zorn_subset S chainub
+  -- ...and S contains upper bounds for any non-empty chains.
+  have chainub : ∀ c ⊆ S, IsChain (· ⊆ ·) c → c.Nonempty →  ∃ ub ∈ S, ∀ s ∈ c, s ⊆ ub := by
+    intros c hcS hcC hcNe
+    use sUnion c
+    refine ⟨?_, fun s hs ↦ le_sSup hs⟩
+    simp [S]
+    refine ⟨IsIdeal_sUnion_chain c (fun _ hJ ↦ (hcS hJ).1) hcC,
+      ⟨fun J hJ ↦ (hcS hJ).2.1,
+      ⟨?_,
+      fun J hJ ↦ (hcS hJ).2.2.2⟩⟩⟩
+    · obtain ⟨J, hJ⟩ := hcNe
+      exact le_trans (hcS hJ).2.2.1 (le_sSup hJ)
+
+  -- Thus, by Zorn's lemma, we can pick a maximal ideal J in S.
+  have zorn := zorn_subset_nonempty S chainub I IinS
   have hJ := Exists.choose_spec zorn
   set Jset := Exists.choose zorn
   obtain ⟨JinS, Jmax⟩ := hJ
   simp only [ge_iff_le, Set.le_eq_subset, S] at JinS
   let J := IsIdeal.toIdeal JinS.1
   use J
+
+  -- By construction, J contains I and is disjoint from F. It remains to prove that J is prime.
   refine ⟨?_, JinS.2.2⟩
+
   have Jpr : IsProper J := isProper_of_not_mem JinS.2.1
   rw [isPrime_iff_mem_or_mem]
   intros a b
+
+  -- From here on the proof is unfinished and the strategy needs some re-thinking.
   contrapose!
   rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩ hab
   let Ja := J ⊔ Ideal.principal a
@@ -59,10 +95,10 @@ theorem prime_ideal_of_disjoint_filter_ideal (F : PFilter α) (I : Ideal α)
     use b
   have Ja_ne_J : Ja.carrier ≠ Jset := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem' ainJa ha
   have J_in_Ja : J ≤ Ja := by simp only [le_sup_left, Ja]
-  have JanS : ¬ S Ja := fun SJa ↦ Ja_ne_J (Jmax Ja SJa J_in_Ja)
+  -- have JanS : ¬ S Ja := by sorry fun SJa ↦ Ja_ne_J (Jmax Ja SJa J_in_Ja)
   have Jb_ne_J : Jb.carrier ≠ Jset := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem' binJb hb
   have J_in_Jb : J ≤ Jb := by simp only [le_sup_left, Jb]
-  have JbnS : ¬ S Jb := fun SJb ↦ Jb_ne_J (Jmax Jb SJb J_in_Jb)
+  -- have JbnS : ¬ S Jb := fun SJb ↦ Jb_ne_J (Jmax Jb SJb J_in_Jb)
   have IleJa : I ≤ Ja := by
     refine le_trans ?_ J_in_Ja
     exact JinS.2.2.1
@@ -73,16 +109,16 @@ theorem prime_ideal_of_disjoint_filter_ideal (F : PFilter α) (I : Ideal α)
     sorry
     -- intro j hj y hy hjy
   have Jbproper : ⊤ ∉ Jb := by sorry
-  have Ja_ndis_F : Set.Nonempty ((Ja : Set α) ∩ F) := by
-    simp only [le_eq_subset, Order.Ideal.isIdeal Ja, SetLike.mem_coe, Japroper, not_false_eq_true,
-      SetLike.coe_subset_coe, IleJa, true_and, S] at JanS
-    rw [Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
-    exact JanS
-  have Jb_ndis_F : Set.Nonempty ((Jb : Set α) ∩ F) := by
-    simp only [le_eq_subset, Order.Ideal.isIdeal Jb, SetLike.mem_coe, Jbproper, not_false_eq_true,
-      SetLike.coe_subset_coe, IleJb, true_and, S] at JbnS
-    rw [Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
-    exact JbnS
+  have Ja_ndis_F : Set.Nonempty ((Ja : Set α) ∩ F) := by sorry
+    -- simp only [le_eq_subset, Order.Ideal.isIdeal Ja, SetLike.mem_coe, Japroper, not_false_eq_true,
+    --   SetLike.coe_subset_coe, IleJa, true_and, S] at JanS
+    -- rw [Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
+    -- exact JanS
+  have Jb_ndis_F : Set.Nonempty ((Jb : Set α) ∩ F) := by sorry
+    -- simp only [le_eq_subset, Order.Ideal.isIdeal Jb, SetLike.mem_coe, Jbproper, not_false_eq_true,
+    --   SetLike.coe_subset_coe, IleJb, true_and, S] at JbnS
+    -- rw [Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
+    -- exact JbnS
   apply inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right.1 at Ja_ndis_F
   apply inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right.1 at Jb_ndis_F
   obtain ⟨c, ⟨hcF, hcJa⟩⟩ := Ja_ndis_F
@@ -91,5 +127,48 @@ theorem prime_ideal_of_disjoint_filter_ideal (F : PFilter α) (I : Ideal α)
   have cd_le_ab : c ⊓ d ≤ a ⊓ b := by sorry
   have : a ⊓ b ∈ F := PFilter.mem_of_le cd_le_ab c_meet_d_inF
   have habJF : a ⊓ b ∈ Jset ∩ F := ⟨hab, this⟩
-  rw [JinS.2.2.2] at habJF
-  exact (Set.mem_empty_iff_false _).1 habJF
+  sorry
+  -- exact (Set.mem_empty_iff_false _).1 habJF
+
+
+
+-- below a sketch for a way that one may separate definitions (but not sure yet how it works with Zorn)
+
+-- def separatingSet (hFI : Disjoint (F : Set α) I) : Set α := by
+--   set S : Set (Set α) := { J : Set α | IsIdeal J ∧ ⊤ ∉ J ∧ I ≤ J ∧ Disjoint (F : Set α) J }
+--   have IS : ↑I ∈ S := by
+--     refine ⟨Order.Ideal.isIdeal I,
+--     ⟨fun h ↦ Set.Nonempty.not_disjoint ⟨⊤, ⟨Order.PFilter.top_mem, h⟩⟩ hFI, by trivial⟩⟩
+
+--   have chainub : ∀ c ⊆ S, IsChain (· ⊆ ·) c → c.Nonempty →  ∃ ub ∈ S, ∀ s ∈ c, s ⊆ ub := by
+--     intros c hcS hcC hcNe
+
+--     use sUnion c
+--     refine ⟨?_, fun s hs ↦ le_sSup hs⟩
+--     simp [S]
+--     refine ⟨IsIdeal_sUnion_chain c (fun _ hJ ↦ (hcS hJ).1) hcC,
+--       ⟨fun J hJ ↦ (hcS hJ).2.1,
+--       ⟨?_,
+--       fun J hJ ↦ (hcS hJ).2.2.2⟩⟩⟩
+--     · obtain ⟨J, hJ⟩ := hcNe
+--       exact le_trans (hcS hJ).2.2.1 (le_sSup hJ)
+
+--   have zorn := zorn_subset_nonempty S chainub I IS
+--   -- have hJ := Exists.choose_spec zorn
+--   use Exists.choose zorn
+
+-- def separatingIdeal (hFI : Disjoint (F : Set α) I) : Ideal α := by sorry
+
+-- def separatingIdeal_isPrime (hFI : Disjoint (F : Set α) I) : IsPrime (separatingIdeal hFI) := by sorry
+
+-- def separator (hFI : Disjoint (F : Set α) I) : PrimePair α :=
+--   Order.Ideal.IsPrime.toPrimePair (separatingIdeal_isPrime hFI)
+
+-- variable (hFI : Disjoint (F : Set α) I)
+
+
+-- theorem separatorI_contains_I : (I : Set α) ⊆ (separator hFI).I := by sorry
+-- theorem separatorF_contains_F : (F : Set α) ⊆ (separator hFI).F := by sorry
+
+-- theorem separatorI_isPrime : IsPrime (separator hFI).I := by sorry
+-- theorem separatorF_isPrime : Order.PFilter.IsPrime (separator hFI).F := by sorry