-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 523
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cythonize LatticePolytope.normal_form(algorithm='palp_native')
, change to default, add as a Polyhedron
method
#36031
Conversation
Polyhedron
method
5391c44
to
593a860
Compare
05da680
to
679aae0
Compare
Polyhedron
methodLatticePolytope.normal_form(algorithm='palp_native')
, change to default, add as a Polyhedron
method
…ut from .lattice_polytope
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
apart from that missing trivial test, no problems
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks
Thanks |
Marking this as a blocker in the hope it can sneak into 10.2 with the other open blocker |
…alp_native')`, change to default, add as a `Polyhedron` method <!-- ^^^^^ Please provide a concise, informative and self-explanatory title. Don't put issue numbers in there, do this in the PR body below. For example, instead of "Fixes sagemath#1234" use "Introduce new method to calculate 1+1" --> <!-- Describe your changes here in detail --> <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> The current default algorithm, using the external, unmaintained `palp` package, is unreliable. Here, as a follow-up on sagemath#35997, we make the reimplementation of the PALP algorithm in Python (`palp_native`) suitable as the new default by speeding it up. We also fix a bug in introduced in sagemath#35997. We also make it available as a method of `Polyhedron` (for base ring `ZZ`). @xuluze <!-- If this PR resolves an open issue, please link to it here. For example "Fixes sagemath#12345". --> <!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it appropriately. --> ### 📝 Checklist <!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> <!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it appropriately --> <!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> <!-- Feel free to remove irrelevant items. --> - [x] The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory. - [ ] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [x] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [ ] I have created tests covering the changes. - [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly. ### ⌛ Dependencies <!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on - sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency - sagemath#34567: ... --> <!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> URL: sagemath#36031 Reported by: Matthias Köppe Reviewer(s): Dima Pasechnik, Frédéric Chapoton, Matthias Köppe
Why is this more worthy of "sneaking in" than e.g. #36551 ? |
Fails on 32-bit
|
Sorry about this; I've disabled this example now (it's also too long on 64 bit even for |
Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit f9aeca5; changes) is ready! 🎉 |
…alp_native')`, change to default, add as a `Polyhedron` method <!-- ^^^^^ Please provide a concise, informative and self-explanatory title. Don't put issue numbers in there, do this in the PR body below. For example, instead of "Fixes sagemath#1234" use "Introduce new method to calculate 1+1" --> <!-- Describe your changes here in detail --> <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> The current default algorithm, using the external, unmaintained `palp` package, is unreliable. Here, as a follow-up on sagemath#35997, we make the reimplementation of the PALP algorithm in Python (`palp_native`) suitable as the new default by speeding it up. We also fix a bug in introduced in sagemath#35997. We also make it available as a method of `Polyhedron` (for base ring `ZZ`). @xuluze <!-- If this PR resolves an open issue, please link to it here. For example "Fixes sagemath#12345". --> <!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it appropriately. --> ### 📝 Checklist <!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> <!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it appropriately --> <!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> <!-- Feel free to remove irrelevant items. --> - [x] The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory. - [ ] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [x] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [ ] I have created tests covering the changes. - [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly. ### ⌛ Dependencies <!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on - sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency - sagemath#34567: ... --> <!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> URL: sagemath#36031 Reported by: Matthias Köppe Reviewer(s): Dima Pasechnik, Frédéric Chapoton, Matthias Köppe
The current default algorithm, using the external, unmaintained
palp
package, is unreliable.Here, as a follow-up on #35997, we make the reimplementation of the PALP algorithm in Python (
palp_native
) suitable as the new default by speeding it up.We also fix a bug in introduced in #35997.
We also make it available as a method of
Polyhedron
(for base ringZZ
).@xuluze
📝 Checklist
⌛ Dependencies