-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 514
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Decentralize sage.rings.numbers_abc #32641
Milestone
Comments
Commit: |
New commits:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Author: Matthias Koeppe |
comment:6
Patchbot is green except for the unrelated failure in |
comment:7
IMO, this is a good idea anyways as it has better code localization. |
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw |
comment:8
Thanks! |
Changed branch from u/mkoeppe/decentralize_sage_rings_numbers_abc to |
mkoeppe
added a commit
to mkoeppe/sage
that referenced
this issue
Feb 12, 2023
mkoeppe
added a commit
to mkoeppe/sage
that referenced
this issue
Feb 12, 2023
mkoeppe
added a commit
to mkoeppe/sage
that referenced
this issue
Sep 21, 2023
vbraun
pushed a commit
to vbraun/sage
that referenced
this issue
Sep 23, 2023
, sagemath#24483, sagemath#24371, sagemath#24511, sagemath#25848, sagemath#26105, sagemath#28481, sagemath#29010, sagemath#29412, sagemath#30332, sagemath#30372, sagemath#31345, sagemath#32375, sagemath#32606, sagemath#32610, sagemath#32612, sagemath#32641, sagemath#32660, sagemath#32750, sagemath#32869, sagemath#33602 <!-- ^^^^^ Please provide a concise, informative and self-explanatory title. Don't put issue numbers in there, do this in the PR body below. For example, instead of "Fixes sagemath#1234" use "Introduce new method to calculate 1+1" --> <!-- Describe your changes here in detail --> <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> <!-- If this PR resolves an open issue, please link to it here. For example "Fixes sagemath#12345". --> <!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it appropriately. --> ### 📝 Checklist <!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> <!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it appropriately --> <!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> <!-- Feel free to remove irrelevant items. --> - [x] The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory. - [ ] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [x] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [ ] I have created tests covering the changes. - [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly. ### ⌛ Dependencies <!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on - sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency - sagemath#34567: ... --> <!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> URL: sagemath#36307 Reported by: Matthias Köppe Reviewer(s):
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
For the modularization, it's better to do the numbers ABC registration in the individual implementation modules.
We keep the module
sage.rings.numbers_abc
just for the doctests.CC: @tscrim
Component: refactoring
Author: Matthias Koeppe
Branch/Commit:
8024209
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32641
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: