Give client and project index page access to employee

[shalapatil]

Notion card

Summary

Added client and project list page access for employees. It was giving forbidden error.

Preview

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to
  not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Checklist:

• I have manually tested all workflows
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have added automated tests for my code

[github-actions]

Current Code Coverage Percent of this PR:

91.03 %

Files having coverage below 100%

Impacted Files	Coverage
/app/controllers/clients_controller.rb	94.44 %
/app/controllers/invoices_controller.rb	66.67 %
/app/controllers/concerns/timesheet.rb	75.0 %
/app/models/project.rb	90.32 %
/app/controllers/users/registrations_controller.rb	40.0 %
/app/controllers/users/sessions_controller.rb	25.0 %
/app/controllers/users/omniauth_callbacks_controller.rb	25.0 %
/app/controllers/users/passwords_controller.rb	41.67 %
/app/controllers/internal_api/v1/timesheet_entry_controller.rb	40.0 %
/app/controllers/internal_api/v1/projects_controller.rb	75.0 %
/app/controllers/internal_api/v1/timesheet_entry/bulk_action_controller.rb	50.0 %

[supriya3105]

LGTM from functional perspective

[rohitjoshixyz]

Fix grammatical errors in spec description and discuss with Gowsik for the failing spec and uncomment it before the merge.
I would suggest using Grammarly and performing a self-review before assigning for a review to avoid such nitpicks

[rohitjoshixyz]

Address this before merging else we tend to never fix it on priority

[keshavbiswa]

LGTM! After you fix Rohit's suggestions and merge conflicts.

[vipulnsward]

top level should describe blocks