Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency coverage to v7.6.0 #1992

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jul 11, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
coverage ==7.5.4 -> ==7.6.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

nedbat/coveragepy (coverage)

v7.6.0

Compare Source

  • Exclusion patterns can now be multi-line, thanks to Daniel Diniz <pull 1807_>. This enables many interesting exclusion use-cases, including those
    requested in issues 118 <issue 118_>
    (entire files), 996 <issue 996_>_ (multiple lines only when appearing together), 1741 <issue 1741_>_ (remainder of a function), and 1803 <issue 1803_>_
    (arbitrary sequence of marked lines). See the :ref:multi_line_exclude
    section of the docs for more details and examples.

  • The JSON report now includes per-function and per-class coverage information.
    Thanks to Daniel Diniz <pull 1809_>_ for getting the work started. This
    closes issue 1793_ and issue 1532_.

  • Fixed an incorrect calculation of "(no class)" lines in the HTML classes
    report.

  • Python 3.13.0b3 is supported.

.. _issue 118:https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1188
.. _issue 996https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/99696
.. _issue 153https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1532532
.. _issue 17https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/17411741
.. _issue 1https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1793/1793
.. _issue https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1803s/1803
.. _pullhttps://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/pull/1807ll/1807
.. _pulhttps://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/pull/1809ull/1809

.. _changes_7-5-4:


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge July 11, 2024 19:20
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 11, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@codecov codecov bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The update made in the requirements.txt is well-handled. Updating such dependencies frequently is important to cover any bug fixes or feature enhancements. It's always a good practice to test our application after upgrading such an important dependency to ensure that it's still working properly.

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ certifi==2024.7.4
cfgv==3.4.0
click==8.1.7
colorama==0.4.6; sys_platform == "win32" or platform_system == "Windows"
coverage==7.5.4
coverage==7.6.0
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You upgraded coverage dependency from version 7.5.4 to 7.6.0. Make sure to check the release notes or changelog for this new version to see if there are any breaking changes that could affect your project. Also, perform necessary tests to confirm everything still works as expected after this upgrade.

Copy link

@codecov codecov bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes in the diff seem to be about updating versions of certain libraries in requirements.txt. Though updating libraries can lead to having more features, performance improvements, or bug fixes, it may also lead to potential compatibility problems since some code written for an older version of a library may not work as expected (or at all) with a newer one. It is imperative that these versions be tested thoroughly before deployment.

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ certifi==2024.7.4
cfgv==3.4.0
click==8.1.7
colorama==0.4.6; sys_platform == "win32" or platform_system == "Windows"
coverage==7.5.4
coverage==7.6.0
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The 'coverage' library has been updated from version 7.5.4 to 7.6.0. Make sure to test that all existing functionality that relies on the 'coverage' library is still working as expected with the new version.

Copy link

@codecov codecov bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes in this diff seem to upgrade the version of the coverage library in requirements.txt from version 7.5.4 to 7.6.0. The code review does not reveal any significant concerns as updating dependencies to newer versions can often include important bug fixes, security patches, and performance improvements. However, it's important to ensure this newer version does not introduce backward incompatible changes or conflicts with other dependencies.

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ certifi==2024.7.4
cfgv==3.4.0
click==8.1.7
colorama==0.4.6; sys_platform == "win32" or platform_system == "Windows"
coverage==7.5.4
coverage==7.6.0
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Make sure to test if the new version of the 'coverage' library (7.6.0) is compatible with the existing codebase and doesn't introduce any breaking changes. Check the documentation or changelog for this version and possibly run your test suite to ensure all functionalities still work as expected.

Copy link

Copy link

deepsource-io bot commented Jul 11, 2024

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 7f7b425..9af0e87. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource JavaScript LogoJavaScript✅ SuccessView Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

@renovate renovate bot added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 11, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 10.51%. Comparing base (7f7b425) to head (9af0e87).

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1992   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   10.51%   10.51%           
=======================================
  Files          97       97           
  Lines        8503     8503           
  Branches      127      127           
=======================================
  Hits          894      894           
  Misses       7609     7609           
Flag Coverage Δ *Carryforward flag
cli 0.00% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 7f7b425
connection 25.26% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 7f7b425
database 9.15% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 7f7b425
gateway 41.37% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 7f7b425
mcots 0.00% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 7f7b425
nps 0.00% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 7f7b425
patch 86.08% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 7f7b425
shard 41.47% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 7f7b425
shared 13.44% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 7f7b425
shared-packets 0.00% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 7f7b425

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Merged via the queue into main with commit 056d137 Jul 11, 2024
12 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/coverage-7.x branch July 11, 2024 19:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants