-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(deps): update dependency coverage to v7.6.0 #1992
Conversation
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The update made in the requirements.txt is well-handled. Updating such dependencies frequently is important to cover any bug fixes or feature enhancements. It's always a good practice to test our application after upgrading such an important dependency to ensure that it's still working properly.
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ certifi==2024.7.4 | |||
cfgv==3.4.0 | |||
click==8.1.7 | |||
colorama==0.4.6; sys_platform == "win32" or platform_system == "Windows" | |||
coverage==7.5.4 | |||
coverage==7.6.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You upgraded coverage
dependency from version 7.5.4 to 7.6.0. Make sure to check the release notes or changelog for this new version to see if there are any breaking changes that could affect your project. Also, perform necessary tests to confirm everything still works as expected after this upgrade.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The changes in the diff seem to be about updating versions of certain libraries in requirements.txt. Though updating libraries can lead to having more features, performance improvements, or bug fixes, it may also lead to potential compatibility problems since some code written for an older version of a library may not work as expected (or at all) with a newer one. It is imperative that these versions be tested thoroughly before deployment.
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ certifi==2024.7.4 | |||
cfgv==3.4.0 | |||
click==8.1.7 | |||
colorama==0.4.6; sys_platform == "win32" or platform_system == "Windows" | |||
coverage==7.5.4 | |||
coverage==7.6.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The 'coverage' library has been updated from version 7.5.4 to 7.6.0. Make sure to test that all existing functionality that relies on the 'coverage' library is still working as expected with the new version.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The changes in this diff seem to upgrade the version of the coverage
library in requirements.txt
from version 7.5.4 to 7.6.0. The code review does not reveal any significant concerns as updating dependencies to newer versions can often include important bug fixes, security patches, and performance improvements. However, it's important to ensure this newer version does not introduce backward incompatible changes or conflicts with other dependencies.
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ certifi==2024.7.4 | |||
cfgv==3.4.0 | |||
click==8.1.7 | |||
colorama==0.4.6; sys_platform == "win32" or platform_system == "Windows" | |||
coverage==7.5.4 | |||
coverage==7.6.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Make sure to test if the new version of the 'coverage' library (7.6.0) is compatible with the existing codebase and doesn't introduce any breaking changes. Check the documentation or changelog for this version and possibly run your test suite to ensure all functionalities still work as expected.
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1992 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 10.51% 10.51%
=======================================
Files 97 97
Lines 8503 8503
Branches 127 127
=======================================
Hits 894 894
Misses 7609 7609
*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
This PR contains the following updates:
==7.5.4
->==7.6.0
Release Notes
nedbat/coveragepy (coverage)
v7.6.0
Compare Source
Exclusion patterns can now be multi-line, thanks to
Daniel Diniz <pull 1807_>
. This enables many interesting exclusion use-cases, including thoserequested in issues
118 <issue 118_>
(entire files),996 <issue 996_>
_ (multiple lines only when appearing together),1741 <issue 1741_>
_ (remainder of a function), and1803 <issue 1803_>
_(arbitrary sequence of marked lines). See the :ref:
multi_line_exclude
section of the docs for more details and examples.
The JSON report now includes per-function and per-class coverage information.
Thanks to
Daniel Diniz <pull 1809_>
_ for getting the work started. Thiscloses
issue 1793
_ andissue 1532
_.Fixed an incorrect calculation of "(no class)" lines in the HTML classes
report.
Python 3.13.0b3 is supported.
.. _issue 118:https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1188
.. _issue 996https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/99696
.. _issue 153https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1532532
.. _issue 17https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/17411741
.. _issue 1https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1793/1793
.. _issue https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1803s/1803
.. _pullhttps://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/pull/1807ll/1807
.. _pulhttps://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/pull/1809ull/1809
.. _changes_7-5-4:
Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Enabled.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.