Fix ICE when return impl ?Sized
#97413
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @michaelwoerister (or someone else) soon. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
impl ?Sizedimpl ?Sized
impl ?Sizedimpl ?Sized
|
Could you add a regression test like #97328? |
|
@JohnTitor updated |
JohnTitor
reviewed
May 26, 2022
JohnTitor
reviewed
May 26, 2022
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Thanks! I'm going to defer to @compiler-errors for the rest of the reviews. |
|
Hi @LYF1999, I don't know if this is the right fix. Can you give me some time to do investigation? Thanks. |
|
@compiler-errors Sure, take your time. |
|
@compiler-errors Thanks! |
compiler-errors
added a commit
to compiler-errors/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2022
don't do `Sized` and other return type checks on RPIT's real type Fixes an ICE where we're doing `Sized` check against the RPIT's real type, instead of against the opaque type. This differs from what we're doing in MIR typeck, which causes ICE rust-lang#97226. This regressed in rust-lang#96516 -- this adjusts that fix to be a bit more conservative. That PR was backported and thus the ICE is also present in stable. Not sure if it's worth to beta and/or stable backport, probably not the latter but I could believe the former. r? `@oli-obk` cc: another attempt to fix this ICE rust-lang#97413. I believe this PR addresses the root cause.
ehuss
pushed a commit
to ehuss/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 24, 2022
don't do `Sized` and other return type checks on RPIT's real type Fixes an ICE where we're doing `Sized` check against the RPIT's real type, instead of against the opaque type. This differs from what we're doing in MIR typeck, which causes ICE rust-lang#97226. This regressed in rust-lang#96516 -- this adjusts that fix to be a bit more conservative. That PR was backported and thus the ICE is also present in stable. Not sure if it's worth to beta and/or stable backport, probably not the latter but I could believe the former. r? `@oli-obk` cc: another attempt to fix this ICE rust-lang#97413. I believe this PR addresses the root cause.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
better tip for return
impl ?SizedFixes #97226