Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove -Z force-overflow-checks #91185

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2021

Conversation

camelid
Copy link
Member

@camelid camelid commented Nov 24, 2021

It was replaced several years ago by the stable option -C overflow-checks.
The goal was to delete the -Z flag once users had migrated 1.
Now that it's been several years, it makes sense to delete the old flag.

See also the discussion on Zulip 2.

r? @wesleywiser
cc @RalfJung

It was replaced several years ago by the stable option `-C
overflow-checks`. The goal was to delete the `-Z` flag once users had
migrated [1]. Now that it's been several years, it makes sense to delete
the old flag.

See also the discussion on Zulip [2].

[1]: rust-lang#33134 (comment)
[2]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/overflow.20checks/near/262497224
@camelid camelid added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Nov 24, 2021
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 24, 2021
@wesleywiser
Copy link
Member

Thanks @camelid!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 24, 2021

📌 Commit f0b990a has been approved by wesleywiser

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 24, 2021
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2021
…=wesleywiser

Remove `-Z force-overflow-checks`

It was replaced several years ago by the stable option `-C overflow-checks`.
The goal was to delete the `-Z` flag once users had migrated [1].
Now that it's been several years, it makes sense to delete the old flag.

See also the discussion on Zulip [2].

[1]: rust-lang#33134 (comment)
[2]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/overflow.20checks/near/262497224

r? `@wesleywiser`
cc `@RalfJung`
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2021
…=wesleywiser

Remove `-Z force-overflow-checks`

It was replaced several years ago by the stable option `-C overflow-checks`.
The goal was to delete the `-Z` flag once users had migrated [1].
Now that it's been several years, it makes sense to delete the old flag.

See also the discussion on Zulip [2].

[1]: rust-lang#33134 (comment)
[2]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/overflow.20checks/near/262497224

r? ``@wesleywiser``
cc ``@RalfJung``
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2021
…askrgr

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#89359 (Various fixes for const_trait_impl)
 - rust-lang#90499 (Link with default MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET if not otherwise specified.)
 - rust-lang#91096 (Print associated types on opaque `impl Trait` types)
 - rust-lang#91111 (Do not visit attributes in `ItemLowerer`.)
 - rust-lang#91162 (explain why CTFE/Miri perform truncation on shift offset)
 - rust-lang#91185 (Remove `-Z force-overflow-checks`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 984e644 into rust-lang:master Nov 25, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.58.0 milestone Nov 25, 2021
@camelid camelid deleted the rm-force-overflow-checks branch November 25, 2021 20:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants