Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

implement rfc-2528 type_changing-struct-update #90035

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 9, 2021
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/error.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ pub enum TypeError<'tcx> {
TupleSize(ExpectedFound<usize>),
FixedArraySize(ExpectedFound<u64>),
ArgCount,
FieldMisMatch(Symbol, Symbol),

RegionsDoesNotOutlive(Region<'tcx>, Region<'tcx>),
RegionsInsufficientlyPolymorphic(BoundRegionKind, Region<'tcx>),
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -134,6 +135,7 @@ impl<'tcx> fmt::Display for TypeError<'tcx> {
pluralize!(values.found)
),
ArgCount => write!(f, "incorrect number of function parameters"),
FieldMisMatch(adt, field) => write!(f, "field type mismatch: {}.{}", adt, field),
RegionsDoesNotOutlive(..) => write!(f, "lifetime mismatch"),
RegionsInsufficientlyPolymorphic(br, _) => write!(
f,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -224,6 +226,7 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeError<'tcx> {
| ArgumentMutability(_)
| TupleSize(_)
| ArgCount
| FieldMisMatch(..)
| RegionsDoesNotOutlive(..)
| RegionsInsufficientlyPolymorphic(..)
| RegionsOverlyPolymorphic(..)
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/structural_impls.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -602,6 +602,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Lift<'tcx> for ty::error::TypeError<'a> {
TupleSize(x) => TupleSize(x),
FixedArraySize(x) => FixedArraySize(x),
ArgCount => ArgCount,
FieldMisMatch(x, y) => FieldMisMatch(x, y),
RegionsDoesNotOutlive(a, b) => {
return tcx.lift((a, b)).map(|(a, b)| RegionsDoesNotOutlive(a, b));
}
Expand Down
159 changes: 119 additions & 40 deletions compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/expr.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -33,12 +33,16 @@ use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
use rustc_hir::{ExprKind, QPath};
use rustc_infer::infer;
use rustc_infer::infer::type_variable::{TypeVariableOrigin, TypeVariableOriginKind};
use rustc_infer::infer::InferOk;
use rustc_middle::ty;
use rustc_middle::ty::adjustment::{Adjust, Adjustment, AllowTwoPhase};
use rustc_middle::ty::error::TypeError::{FieldMisMatch, Sorts};
use rustc_middle::ty::relate::expected_found_bool;
use rustc_middle::ty::subst::SubstsRef;
use rustc_middle::ty::Ty;
use rustc_middle::ty::TypeFoldable;
use rustc_middle::ty::{AdtKind, Visibility};
use rustc_session::parse::feature_err;
use rustc_span::edition::LATEST_STABLE_EDITION;
use rustc_span::hygiene::DesugaringKind;
use rustc_span::lev_distance::find_best_match_for_name;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1262,49 +1266,17 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
.emit_err(StructExprNonExhaustive { span: expr.span, what: adt.variant_descr() });
}

let error_happened = self.check_expr_struct_fields(
self.check_expr_struct_fields(
adt_ty,
expected,
expr.hir_id,
qpath.span(),
variant,
fields,
base_expr.is_none(),
base_expr,
expr.span,
);
if let Some(base_expr) = base_expr {
jackh726 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
// If check_expr_struct_fields hit an error, do not attempt to populate
// the fields with the base_expr. This could cause us to hit errors later
// when certain fields are assumed to exist that in fact do not.
if !error_happened {
self.check_expr_has_type_or_error(base_expr, adt_ty, |_| {});
match adt_ty.kind() {
ty::Adt(adt, substs) if adt.is_struct() => {
let fru_field_types = adt
.non_enum_variant()
.fields
.iter()
.map(|f| {
self.normalize_associated_types_in(
expr.span,
f.ty(self.tcx, substs),
)
})
.collect();

self.typeck_results
.borrow_mut()
.fru_field_types_mut()
.insert(expr.hir_id, fru_field_types);
}
_ => {
self.tcx
.sess
.emit_err(FunctionalRecordUpdateOnNonStruct { span: base_expr.span });
}
}
}
}

self.require_type_is_sized(adt_ty, expr.span, traits::StructInitializerSized);
adt_ty
}
Expand All @@ -1317,9 +1289,9 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
span: Span,
variant: &'tcx ty::VariantDef,
ast_fields: &'tcx [hir::ExprField<'tcx>],
check_completeness: bool,
base_expr: &'tcx Option<&'tcx hir::Expr<'tcx>>,
expr_span: Span,
) -> bool {
) {
let tcx = self.tcx;

let adt_ty_hint = self
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1394,7 +1366,116 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
)
.emit();
}
} else if check_completeness && !error_happened && !remaining_fields.is_empty() {
}

// If check_expr_struct_fields hit an error, do not attempt to populate
// the fields with the base_expr. This could cause us to hit errors later
// when certain fields are assumed to exist that in fact do not.
if error_happened {
return;
}

if let Some(base_expr) = base_expr {
jackh726 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
// FIXME: We are currently creating two branches here in order to maintain
// consistency. But they should be merged as much as possible.
let fru_tys = if self.tcx.features().type_changing_struct_update {
let base_ty = self.check_expr(base_expr);
match adt_ty.kind() {
ty::Adt(adt, substs) if adt.is_struct() => {
match base_ty.kind() {
ty::Adt(base_adt, base_subs) if adt == base_adt => {
variant
.fields
.iter()
.map(|f| {
let fru_ty = self.normalize_associated_types_in(
expr_span,
self.field_ty(base_expr.span, f, base_subs),
);
let ident = self.tcx.adjust_ident(f.ident, variant.def_id);
if let Some(_) = remaining_fields.remove(&ident) {
let target_ty =
self.field_ty(base_expr.span, f, substs);
let cause = self.misc(base_expr.span);
match self
.at(&cause, self.param_env)
.sup(target_ty, fru_ty)
{
Ok(InferOk { obligations, value: () }) => {
self.register_predicates(obligations)
}
// FIXME: Need better diagnostics for `FieldMisMatch` error
Err(_) => self
.report_mismatched_types(
&cause,
target_ty,
fru_ty,
FieldMisMatch(
variant.ident.name,
ident.name,
),
)
.emit(),
}
}
fru_ty
})
.collect()
}
_ => {
return self
.report_mismatched_types(
&self.misc(base_expr.span),
adt_ty,
base_ty,
Sorts(expected_found_bool(true, adt_ty, base_ty)),
)
.emit();
}
}
}
_ => {
return self
.tcx
.sess
.emit_err(FunctionalRecordUpdateOnNonStruct { span: base_expr.span });
}
}
} else {
self.check_expr_has_type_or_error(base_expr, adt_ty, |_| {
let base_ty = self.check_expr(base_expr);
let same_adt = match (adt_ty.kind(), base_ty.kind()) {
(ty::Adt(adt, _), ty::Adt(base_adt, _)) if adt == base_adt => true,
_ => false,
};
if self.tcx.sess.is_nightly_build() && same_adt {
feature_err(
&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess,
sym::type_changing_struct_update,
base_expr.span,
"type changing struct updating is experimental",
)
.emit();
}
});
match adt_ty.kind() {
ty::Adt(adt, substs) if adt.is_struct() => variant
.fields
.iter()
.map(|f| {
self.normalize_associated_types_in(expr_span, f.ty(self.tcx, substs))
})
.collect(),
_ => {
return self
.tcx
.sess
.emit_err(FunctionalRecordUpdateOnNonStruct { span: base_expr.span });
}
}
};
self.typeck_results.borrow_mut().fru_field_types_mut().insert(expr_id, fru_tys);
} else if kind_name != "union" && !remaining_fields.is_empty() {
let inaccessible_remaining_fields = remaining_fields.iter().any(|(_, (_, field))| {
!field.vis.is_accessible_from(tcx.parent_module(expr_id).to_def_id(), tcx)
});
Expand All @@ -1405,8 +1486,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
self.report_missing_fields(adt_ty, span, remaining_fields);
}
}

error_happened
}

fn check_struct_fields_on_error(
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
# `type_changing_struct_update`

The tracking issue for this feature is: [#86555]

[#86555]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86555

------------------------

This implements [RFC2528]. When turned on, you can create instances of the same struct
that have different generic type or lifetime parameters.

[RFC2528]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2528-type-changing-struct-update-syntax.md

```rust
#![allow(unused_variables, dead_code)]
#![feature(type_changing_struct_update)]

fn main () {
struct Foo<T, U> {
jackh726 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
field1: T,
field2: U,
}

let base: Foo<String, i32> = Foo {
field1: String::from("hello"),
field2: 1234,
};
let updated: Foo<f64, i32> = Foo {
field1: 3.14,
..base
};
}
```

This file was deleted.

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
// gate-test-type_changing_struct_update

#[derive(Debug)]
struct Machine<S> {
state: S,
Expand All @@ -17,9 +19,10 @@ fn update_to_state2() {
};
let m2: Machine<State2> = Machine {
state: State2,
..m1 //~ ERROR mismatched types
..m1
//~^ ERROR type changing struct updating is experimental [E0658]
//~| ERROR mismatched types [E0308]
};
// FIXME: this should trigger feature gate
assert_eq!(State2, m2.state);
}

Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
error[E0658]: type changing struct updating is experimental
--> $DIR/feature-gate.rs:22:11
|
LL | ..m1
| ^^
|
= note: see issue #86555 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86555> for more information
= help: add `#![feature(type_changing_struct_update)]` to the crate attributes to enable

error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/feature-gate.rs:22:11
|
LL | ..m1
| ^^ expected struct `State2`, found struct `State1`
|
= note: expected struct `Machine<State2>`
found struct `Machine<State1>`

error: aborting due to 2 previous errors

Some errors have detailed explanations: E0308, E0658.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0308`.
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
#![feature(type_changing_struct_update)]
#![allow(incomplete_features)]

#[derive(Clone)]
struct Machine<'a, S> {
state: S,
lt_str: &'a str,
common_field: i32,
}

#[derive(Clone)]
struct State1;
#[derive(Clone)]
struct State2;

fn update_to_state2() {
let s = String::from("hello");
let m1: Machine<State1> = Machine {
state: State1,
lt_str: &s,
//~^ ERROR `s` does not live long enough [E0597]
// FIXME: The error here actually comes from line 34. The
// span of the error message should be corrected to line 34
common_field: 2,
};
// update lifetime
let m3: Machine<'static, State1> = Machine {
lt_str: "hello, too",
..m1.clone()
};
// update lifetime and type
let m4: Machine<'static, State2> = Machine {
state: State2,
lt_str: "hello, again",
..m1.clone()
};
// updating to `static should fail.
let m2: Machine<'static, State1> = Machine {
..m1
};
}

fn main() {}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
error[E0597]: `s` does not live long enough
--> $DIR/lifetime-update.rs:20:17
|
LL | lt_str: &s,
| ^^ borrowed value does not live long enough
...
LL | let m2: Machine<'static, State1> = Machine {
| ------------------------ type annotation requires that `s` is borrowed for `'static`
...
LL | }
| - `s` dropped here while still borrowed

error: aborting due to previous error

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0597`.
Loading