-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
build doctests with lld if use-lld = true #86113
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Jun 7, 2021
mati865
reviewed
Jun 8, 2021
mati865
reviewed
Jun 8, 2021
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 0ddc3af has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jun 9, 2021
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2021
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#82037 (Make symbols stripping work on MacOS X) - rust-lang#84687 (Multiple improvements to RwLocks) - rust-lang#85997 (rustdoc: Print a warning if the diff when comparing to old nightlies is empty) - rust-lang#86051 (Updated code examples and wording in move keyword documentation ) - rust-lang#86111 (fix off by one in `std::iter::Iterator` documentation) - rust-lang#86113 (build doctests with lld if use-lld = true) - rust-lang#86175 (update Miri) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 4, 2025
…zkan Allow using self-contained LLD in bootstrap In rust-lang#116278, I added a `"self-contained"` mode to the `rust.use-lld` bootstrap option, which was designed for using the built-in LLD for linking compiler artifacts. However, this was later reverted in rust-lang#118810. This PR brings the old logic back, which switches LLD in bootstrap from `-fuse-ld=lld` to [MCP510](rust-lang/compiler-team#510 way of passing linker flags to enable LLD (both external and self-contained). So this does two changes: 1) Goes from `-fuse-ld=lld` to MCP510 2) Actually makes it possible to use the self-contained LLD to compile compiler artifacts Regarding the second commit: Since rust-lang#86113, we have been passing `-fuse-ld=lld` as a target flag to all tests when `use-lld = true` is enabled. This kind of worked for all tests, since it was just a linker argument, which has bypassed any compiler checks, and probably resulted only in some warning if the given target linker didn't actually support LLD. However, after the first commit, some tests actually start failing with this approach: ``` error: linker flavor `gnu-lld-cc` is incompatible with the current target | = note: compatible flavors are: llbc, ptx ``` So the second commit removes the passing of LLD flags as target flags to tests. I don't think that it's a good idea to pass specific compiler flags to all tests unconditionally, tbh. The doctest command from rust-lang#86113 doesn't go through compiletest anymore, and doctests should be quite a lot faster since rust-lang#126245 in general. CC `@the8472` If someone has a beefy machine, it would be nice to test whether this doesn't regress test execution speed. How to do that: 1) Enable `rust.use-lld = true` and `rust.lld = true` in `config.toml` 2) Benchmark `./x test tests/ui --force-rerun` between `master` and this PR Once this is tested in the wild, I would like to make the self-contained LLD the default in CI, hopefully to make CI builds faster. r? `@onur-ozkan`
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 4, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#135001 - Kobzol:bootstrap-mcp-510, r=onur-ozkan Allow using self-contained LLD in bootstrap In rust-lang#116278, I added a `"self-contained"` mode to the `rust.use-lld` bootstrap option, which was designed for using the built-in LLD for linking compiler artifacts. However, this was later reverted in rust-lang#118810. This PR brings the old logic back, which switches LLD in bootstrap from `-fuse-ld=lld` to [MCP510](rust-lang/compiler-team#510 way of passing linker flags to enable LLD (both external and self-contained). So this does two changes: 1) Goes from `-fuse-ld=lld` to MCP510 2) Actually makes it possible to use the self-contained LLD to compile compiler artifacts Regarding the second commit: Since rust-lang#86113, we have been passing `-fuse-ld=lld` as a target flag to all tests when `use-lld = true` is enabled. This kind of worked for all tests, since it was just a linker argument, which has bypassed any compiler checks, and probably resulted only in some warning if the given target linker didn't actually support LLD. However, after the first commit, some tests actually start failing with this approach: ``` error: linker flavor `gnu-lld-cc` is incompatible with the current target | = note: compatible flavors are: llbc, ptx ``` So the second commit removes the passing of LLD flags as target flags to tests. I don't think that it's a good idea to pass specific compiler flags to all tests unconditionally, tbh. The doctest command from rust-lang#86113 doesn't go through compiletest anymore, and doctests should be quite a lot faster since rust-lang#126245 in general. CC `@the8472` If someone has a beefy machine, it would be nice to test whether this doesn't regress test execution speed. How to do that: 1) Enable `rust.use-lld = true` and `rust.lld = true` in `config.toml` 2) Benchmark `./x test tests/ui --force-rerun` between `master` and this PR Once this is tested in the wild, I would like to make the self-contained LLD the default in CI, hopefully to make CI builds faster. r? `@onur-ozkan`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
results when running
./x.py test library/core --doc --stage 0
: