Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build doctests with lld if use-lld = true #86113

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2021
Merged

Conversation

the8472
Copy link
Member

@the8472 the8472 commented Jun 7, 2021

results when running ./x.py test library/core --doc --stage 0:

# OLD
test result: FAILED. 2844 passed; 6 failed; 28 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 21.13s

# NEW
test result: FAILED. 2844 passed; 6 failed; 28 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 11.92s

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 7, 2021
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 9, 2021

📌 Commit 0ddc3af has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 9, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2021
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#82037 (Make symbols stripping work on MacOS X)
 - rust-lang#84687 (Multiple improvements to RwLocks)
 - rust-lang#85997 (rustdoc: Print a warning if the diff when comparing to old nightlies is empty)
 - rust-lang#86051 (Updated code examples and wording in move keyword documentation )
 - rust-lang#86111 (fix off by one in `std::iter::Iterator` documentation)
 - rust-lang#86113 (build doctests with lld if use-lld = true)
 - rust-lang#86175 (update Miri)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit f7aea23 into rust-lang:master Jun 10, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.54.0 milestone Jun 10, 2021
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2025
…zkan

Allow using self-contained LLD in bootstrap

In rust-lang#116278, I added a `"self-contained"` mode to the `rust.use-lld` bootstrap option, which was designed for using the built-in LLD for linking compiler artifacts. However, this was later reverted in rust-lang#118810.

This PR brings the old logic back, which switches LLD in bootstrap from `-fuse-ld=lld` to [MCP510](rust-lang/compiler-team#510 way of passing linker flags to enable LLD (both external and self-contained). So this does two changes:
1) Goes from `-fuse-ld=lld` to MCP510
2) Actually makes it possible to use the self-contained LLD to compile compiler artifacts

Regarding the second commit: Since rust-lang#86113, we have been passing `-fuse-ld=lld` as a target flag to all tests when `use-lld = true` is enabled. This kind of worked for all tests, since it was just a linker argument, which has bypassed any compiler checks, and probably resulted only in some warning if the given target linker didn't actually support LLD. However, after the first commit, some tests actually start failing with this approach:
```
error: linker flavor `gnu-lld-cc` is incompatible with the current target
   |
   = note: compatible flavors are: llbc, ptx
```
So the second commit removes the passing of LLD flags as target flags to tests. I don't think that it's a good idea to pass specific compiler flags to all tests unconditionally, tbh. The doctest command from rust-lang#86113 doesn't go through compiletest anymore, and doctests should be quite a lot faster since rust-lang#126245 in general.

CC `@the8472`

If someone has a beefy machine, it would be nice to test whether this doesn't regress test execution speed. How to do that:
1) Enable `rust.use-lld = true` and `rust.lld = true` in `config.toml`
2) Benchmark `./x test tests/ui --force-rerun` between `master` and this PR

Once this is tested in the wild, I would like to make the self-contained LLD the default in CI, hopefully to make CI builds faster.

r? `@onur-ozkan`
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#135001 - Kobzol:bootstrap-mcp-510, r=onur-ozkan

Allow using self-contained LLD in bootstrap

In rust-lang#116278, I added a `"self-contained"` mode to the `rust.use-lld` bootstrap option, which was designed for using the built-in LLD for linking compiler artifacts. However, this was later reverted in rust-lang#118810.

This PR brings the old logic back, which switches LLD in bootstrap from `-fuse-ld=lld` to [MCP510](rust-lang/compiler-team#510 way of passing linker flags to enable LLD (both external and self-contained). So this does two changes:
1) Goes from `-fuse-ld=lld` to MCP510
2) Actually makes it possible to use the self-contained LLD to compile compiler artifacts

Regarding the second commit: Since rust-lang#86113, we have been passing `-fuse-ld=lld` as a target flag to all tests when `use-lld = true` is enabled. This kind of worked for all tests, since it was just a linker argument, which has bypassed any compiler checks, and probably resulted only in some warning if the given target linker didn't actually support LLD. However, after the first commit, some tests actually start failing with this approach:
```
error: linker flavor `gnu-lld-cc` is incompatible with the current target
   |
   = note: compatible flavors are: llbc, ptx
```
So the second commit removes the passing of LLD flags as target flags to tests. I don't think that it's a good idea to pass specific compiler flags to all tests unconditionally, tbh. The doctest command from rust-lang#86113 doesn't go through compiletest anymore, and doctests should be quite a lot faster since rust-lang#126245 in general.

CC `@the8472`

If someone has a beefy machine, it would be nice to test whether this doesn't regress test execution speed. How to do that:
1) Enable `rust.use-lld = true` and `rust.lld = true` in `config.toml`
2) Benchmark `./x test tests/ui --force-rerun` between `master` and this PR

Once this is tested in the wild, I would like to make the self-contained LLD the default in CI, hopefully to make CI builds faster.

r? `@onur-ozkan`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants