Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Snapshot clean-ups #64939

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 10, 2019
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
22 changes: 5 additions & 17 deletions src/librustc/infer/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -814,16 +814,16 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
/// Executes `f` and commit the bindings.
pub fn commit_unconditionally<R, F>(&self, f: F) -> R
where
F: FnOnce() -> R,
F: FnOnce(&CombinedSnapshot<'a, 'tcx>) -> R,
{
debug!("commit()");
debug!("commit_unconditionally()");
let snapshot = self.start_snapshot();
let r = f();
let r = f(&snapshot);
self.commit_from(snapshot);
r
}

/// Executes `f` and commit the bindings if closure `f` returns `Ok(_)`.
/// Execute `f` and commit the bindings if closure `f` returns `Ok(_)`.
pub fn commit_if_ok<T, E, F>(&self, f: F) -> Result<T, E>
where
F: FnOnce(&CombinedSnapshot<'a, 'tcx>) -> Result<T, E>,
Expand All @@ -843,19 +843,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
r
}

/// Execute `f` in a snapshot, and commit the bindings it creates.
pub fn in_snapshot<T, F>(&self, f: F) -> T
where
F: FnOnce(&CombinedSnapshot<'a, 'tcx>) -> T,
{
debug!("in_snapshot()");
let snapshot = self.start_snapshot();
let r = f(&snapshot);
self.commit_from(snapshot);
r
}

/// Executes `f` then unroll any bindings it creates.
/// Execute `f` then unroll any bindings it creates.
pub fn probe<R, F>(&self, f: F) -> R
where
F: FnOnce(&CombinedSnapshot<'a, 'tcx>) -> R,
Expand Down
8 changes: 5 additions & 3 deletions src/librustc/infer/region_constraints/leak_check.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -14,9 +14,11 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionConstraintCollector<'tcx> {
/// retain the older (arguably incorrect) behavior of the
/// compiler.
///
/// NB. The use of snapshot here is mostly an efficiency thing --
/// we could search *all* region constraints, but that'd be a
/// bigger set and the data structures are not setup for that. If
/// NB. Although `_snapshot` isn't used, it's passed in to prove
/// that we are in a snapshot, which guarantees that we can just
/// search the "undo log" for edges. This is mostly an efficiency
/// thing -- we could search *all* region constraints, but that'd be
/// a bigger set and the data structures are not setup for that. If
/// we wind up keeping some form of this check long term, it would
/// probably be better to remove the snapshot parameter and to
/// refactor the constraint set.
nnethercote marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
Expand Down
35 changes: 18 additions & 17 deletions src/librustc/traits/select.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2819,7 +2819,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
// binder moved -\
let ty: ty::Binder<Ty<'tcx>> = ty::Binder::bind(ty); // <----/

self.infcx.in_snapshot(|_| {
self.infcx.commit_unconditionally(|_| {
let (skol_ty, _) = self.infcx
.replace_bound_vars_with_placeholders(&ty);
let Normalized {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2932,7 +2932,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
}

fn confirm_projection_candidate(&mut self, obligation: &TraitObligation<'tcx>) {
self.infcx.in_snapshot(|snapshot| {
self.infcx.commit_unconditionally(|snapshot| {
let result =
self.match_projection_obligation_against_definition_bounds(
obligation,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -3054,19 +3054,20 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
nested,
);

let trait_obligations: Vec<PredicateObligation<'_>> = self.infcx.in_snapshot(|_| {
let poly_trait_ref = obligation.predicate.to_poly_trait_ref();
let (trait_ref, _) = self.infcx
.replace_bound_vars_with_placeholders(&poly_trait_ref);
let cause = obligation.derived_cause(ImplDerivedObligation);
self.impl_or_trait_obligations(
cause,
obligation.recursion_depth + 1,
obligation.param_env,
trait_def_id,
&trait_ref.substs,
)
});
let trait_obligations: Vec<PredicateObligation<'_>> =
self.infcx.commit_unconditionally(|_| {
let poly_trait_ref = obligation.predicate.to_poly_trait_ref();
let (trait_ref, _) = self.infcx
.replace_bound_vars_with_placeholders(&poly_trait_ref);
let cause = obligation.derived_cause(ImplDerivedObligation);
self.impl_or_trait_obligations(
cause,
obligation.recursion_depth + 1,
obligation.param_env,
trait_def_id,
&trait_ref.substs,
)
});

// Adds the predicates from the trait. Note that this contains a `Self: Trait`
// predicate as usual. It won't have any effect since auto traits are coinductive.
Expand All @@ -3089,7 +3090,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {

// First, create the substitutions by matching the impl again,
// this time not in a probe.
self.infcx.in_snapshot(|snapshot| {
self.infcx.commit_unconditionally(|snapshot| {
let substs = self.rematch_impl(impl_def_id, obligation, snapshot);
debug!("confirm_impl_candidate: substs={:?}", substs);
let cause = obligation.derived_cause(ImplDerivedObligation);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -3253,7 +3254,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
obligation, alias_def_id
);

self.infcx.in_snapshot(|_| {
self.infcx.commit_unconditionally(|_| {
let (predicate, _) = self.infcx()
.replace_bound_vars_with_placeholders(&obligation.predicate);
let trait_ref = predicate.trait_ref;
Expand Down