Rename sanitizer runtime libraries on OSX #54681
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Currently we ship sanitizer libraries as they're built, but these names unfortunately conflict with the names of the sanitizer libraries installed on the system. If a crate, for example, links in C code that wants to use the system sanitizer and the Rust code doesn't use sanitizers at all, then using `cargo` may accidentally pull in the Rust-installed sanitizer library due to a conflict in names. This change is intended to be entirely transparent for Rust users of sanitizers, it should only hopefully improve our story with other users! Closes rust-lang#54134
|
r? @aturon (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
r? @kennytm |
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit b315760 has been approved by |
| let new_name = format!("lib__rustc__{}.dylib", name); | ||
| let dst = dir.join(&new_name); | ||
|
|
||
| println!("{} => {}", src.display(), dst.display()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hm, can we either remove this or make it slightly more descriptive?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh this is only executed as part of a build script so it's always hidden by default, and I was just hoping it'd be useful if things when wrong and something needed to be debugged
kennytm
added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 1, 2018
Rename sanitizer runtime libraries on OSX Currently we ship sanitizer libraries as they're built, but these names unfortunately conflict with the names of the sanitizer libraries installed on the system. If a crate, for example, links in C code that wants to use the system sanitizer and the Rust code doesn't use sanitizers at all, then using `cargo` may accidentally pull in the Rust-installed sanitizer library due to a conflict in names. This change is intended to be entirely transparent for Rust users of sanitizers, it should only hopefully improve our story with other users! Closes rust-lang#54134
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 1, 2018
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - #53784 (Document that slices cannot be larger than `isize::MAX` bytes) - #54308 (Better user experience when attempting to call associated functions with dot notation) - #54488 (in which we include attributes in unused `extern crate` suggestion spans) - #54544 (Indicate how to move value out of Box in docs.) - #54623 (Added help message for `impl_trait_in_bindings` feature gate) - #54641 (A few cleanups and minor improvements to rustc/infer) - #54656 (Correct doc for WorkQueue<T>::pop().) - #54674 (update miri) - #54676 (Remove `-Z disable_ast_check_for_mutation_in_guard`) - #54679 (Improve bug! message for impossible case in Relate) - #54681 (Rename sanitizer runtime libraries on OSX) - #54708 (Make ./x.py help <cmd> invoke ./x.py <cmd> -h on its own) - #54713 (Add nightly check for tool_lints warning)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently we ship sanitizer libraries as they're built, but these names
unfortunately conflict with the names of the sanitizer libraries
installed on the system. If a crate, for example, links in C code that
wants to use the system sanitizer and the Rust code doesn't use
sanitizers at all, then using
cargomay accidentally pull in theRust-installed sanitizer library due to a conflict in names.
This change is intended to be entirely transparent for Rust users of
sanitizers, it should only hopefully improve our story with other users!
Closes #54134