-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix confusion about parts required for float formatting #41859
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
??? I still count 5 parts
+
,0.
,0000
,2
and0000
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's unfortunate that the
[]
notation is being used in two ways here: to denote aPart
and to--I think--indicate the optional quality of the sign of the formatted number. Since the[+]
is being used in the latter sense, it does not count as aPart
that would be stored in theparts
array.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, perhaps the
+
should use a different bracket or no brackets, or just omit the+
altogether. Also, why the45
is changed to2
? That doesn't seem to make any difference.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My understanding of the use of the numbers here was that they were denoting the index of the associated
Part
in theparts
array. So the45
shouldn't be understood as the number "45", butparts[4]
andparts[5]
. (Which is not correct in the first place, I believe.) You can see this notation on display a little more clearly into_shortest_exp_str
, where we have[+][1][.][2345][e][-][6]
as a result of this patch, though note that 1-based indexing is being used here rather than 0-based... I changed45
to2
following said understanding, as the non-zero numbers there would beparts[2]
.I agree that this is not the best notation for explaining things! Perhaps a separate pull request would be appropriate to make the documentation a little clearer?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
… I think you are overthinking about this 😄 When the documentation was originally written, the
+
sign is indeed a part, so[+][1][.][2345][e][-][67]
had 7 parts because there are 7[]
s, not due to 1234567. Later the+
sign is no longer a part but the documentation failed to catch up until this PR.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, indeed! :)