-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Misc. rustc_codegen_ssa
cleanups 🧹
#136439
Open
yotamofek
wants to merge
4
commits into
rust-lang:master
Choose a base branch
from
yotamofek:pr/codegen-ssa-no-indexing
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+95
−110
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c930bb2
rustc_codegen_ssa: use slice patterns instead of len-check+indexing
yotamofek 9e5e6a9
rustc_codegen_ssa: cleanup nested `if`s and a needless `match`
yotamofek a821785
rustc_codegen_ssa: simplify test for incompatible dependency formats
yotamofek 73d5fe1
rustc_codegen_ssa: cleanup codegen attrs
yotamofek File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this is equivalent, because if say the crate type 2 and 3 disagree it will no longer emit an error.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the
==
operator not transitive for this type?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is. But say the dependency formats have 3 elements (where each element is a list), where the the second list and the last list are different. Previously, this was detected, because all combinations are checked, but now it is no longer detected because you only compare the first list against all other lists. The second and third lists are no longer compared.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do agree with @kadiwa4 on this. In your example if the second and last lists are different, then the first and last list will also be different, and it would still be caught.
But I might just be completely wrong on this, I dunno 😅
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(assuming the second and first lists don't compare as equal)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that's what I thought.
This is the (slightly shortened) definition of the transitivity property from the std docs:
Now say
a = dep_formats[1].1
,b = dep_formats[0].1
andc = dep_formats[2].1
. In the.find()
method, the code checks thatb == a
andb == c
. Assuming thatfind
finishes without finding a mismatch, we now know that according to the transitivity property,a == c
is true (i.e.dep_formats[1].1 == dep_formats[2].1
).(I am assuming that
b == a
is the same asa == b
of course.)