Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cargo: support optional signing of packages.json files. #1363

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 21, 2011
Merged

cargo: support optional signing of packages.json files. #1363

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 21, 2011

Conversation

elly
Copy link
Contributor

@elly elly commented Dec 21, 2011

Add extra source fields: "sig" is a url at which a detached signature of a packages.json file can be found, "key" is a url at which a public key block can be found, and "keyfp" is the gpg fingerprint of the key which signs packages.json. If all three fields are present, signatures are checked at sync time and invalid signatures are rejected.

Also, add 'cargo init', which fetches a default sources.json from www.rust-lang.org.

Signed-off-by: Elly Jones elly@leptoquark.net

Elly Jones added 2 commits December 20, 2011 20:10
In aid of search, add a new field to the packages.json format, called "tags",
whose value is a list of strings. Search accepts a list of tags, all of which
must match for the package to be shown.

Signed-off-by: Elly Jones <elly@leptoquark.net>
@elly
Copy link
Contributor Author

elly commented Dec 21, 2011

The second listed commit adds 'search' and 'list' commands.

graydon added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2011
cargo: support optional signing of packages.json files.
@graydon graydon merged commit 1488387 into rust-lang:master Dec 21, 2011
bjorn3 added a commit to bjorn3/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2023
coastalwhite pushed a commit to coastalwhite/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants