-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix typo in suggest.rs where f32 was used instead of f64 #114732
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @b-naber (or someone else) soon. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (
|
A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain) Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
@compiler-errors I could not come up with a test that would reproduce the impact of this typo unfortunately. It will have an impact only if I did try by implementing a custom trait of my own for Please suggest a test I can add. |
Someone please help me resolve this. The error looks related to the build system itself:
Perhaps retrying the job is enough? |
Just force push your branch to retry. |
Yeah, I guess this doesn't need a test. @gurry has a good point above about unambiguously resolving because there are only two float kinds. |
@bors r+ rollup (whatever, this pr doesnt need ci) |
Fix typo in suggest.rs where f32 was used instead of f64 Fixes rust-lang#114683
This isn't merged, btw |
Why didn't it get merged @klensy? It says above that I "closed this X hours ago", but I didn't do anything. |
Ah, I did delete the branch in my repo. That was stupid. Let me try to reopen if I can. |
Could not assign reviewer from: |
@rustbot review |
Fix typo in suggest.rs where f32 was used instead of f64 Fixes rust-lang#114683
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (bd54536): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 633.837s -> 632.779s (-0.17%) |
Fixes #114683