Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix to pass os::tests::copy_file_ok on android #10377

Closed
yichoi opened this issue Nov 9, 2013 · 2 comments
Closed

fix to pass os::tests::copy_file_ok on android #10377

yichoi opened this issue Nov 9, 2013 · 2 comments
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc O-android Operating system: Android

Comments

@yichoi
Copy link
Contributor

yichoi commented Nov 9, 2013

To enable test on android bot #9120

libstd/rt/io/fs.rs :
fn copy_file_ok() {
...
}

this issue depends #10175

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This test no longer exists in os, but rather in fs. What's the error that you're seeing when running the test?

@yichoi
Copy link
Contributor Author

yichoi commented Nov 10, 2013

seems not reproduced any more. closing

@yichoi yichoi closed this as completed Nov 10, 2013
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this issue Jun 30, 2023
[`allow_attributes`, `allow_attributes_without_reason`]: Ignore attributes from procedural macros

I use `lint_reasons` and `clap`, which is a bit overzealous when it comes to preventing warnings in its macros; it uses a ton of allow attributes on everything to, as ironic as it is, silence warnings. These two now ignore anything from procedural macros.

PS, I think `allow_attributes.rs` should be merged with `attrs.rs` in the future.

fixes rust-lang#10377

changelog: [`allow_attributes`, `allow_attributes_without_reason`]: Ignore attributes from procedural macros
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc O-android Operating system: Android
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants