-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
"Fatal error: exception Assert_failure("boot/me/trans.ml", 2912, 6)" with return from for-each block #100
Comments
There's no support for breaking out of a foreach loop yet. The call protocol associated with put statements needs to understand that the inner block can return with different status indicators (returning from controlling frame, breaking loop, continuing loop) and propagate these outwards as needed. It's a bit of a task, but you're welcome to take it! |
Filed feature-request as #119. This one remains about an un-trapped unimpl case. |
Add XFAIL'ed test for return-in-iter, call unimpl when we find it. Closed by eaa3561. |
…r_as_fn allow the use of tuple struct constructors as functions
* Add _mm_set_ss * Add _mm_set1_ps and _mm_set_ps1 * Add _mm_set_ps * Add _mm_setr_ps * Add _mm_setzero_ps * Fix _mm_setr_ps instr test on x86 * Sidestep black_box ABI issue on i586
Divide items and expressions into sections
Make `tests/full.rs` no longer use `git diff`
Fix sat math at the cost of Simd{U,I}128 for now
…verification failure (rust-lang#100)
`ansi_term` is no longer maintained and for the simple needs here, `colored` is much better suited anyway. Fixes rust-lang#99.
But if you change the return type to (), different error:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: