Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Fix another issue with fixup reversing #18899

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2025

Conversation

ChayimFriedman2
Copy link
Contributor

We need to remove the whole subtree, but we don't advance i by this, because it hasn't gotten there yet (and never will).

This was a stupid mistake on my part.

Fixes #18898.

We need to *remove* the whole subtree, but we don't advance `i` by this, because it hasn't gotten there yet (and never will).
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 9, 2025

// Reads ident type within string quotes, for issue #17479.
#[derive(Debug)]
struct Issue18898ProcMacroExpander;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would be nice if we could manage to make these defs work in line (that is where the test is defined at least) as an improvement for the tsting infra

@Veykril Veykril added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 10, 2025
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:master with commit b75a969 Jan 10, 2025
9 checks passed
@ChayimFriedman2 ChayimFriedman2 deleted the issue-18898 branch January 10, 2025 07:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

thread 'Worker' panicked: called Option::unwrap() on a None value
3 participants