Improve extension description and README #12242
Conversation
6aa368d to
85fe939
Compare
editors/code/package.json
Outdated
| @@ -1,15 +1,15 @@ | |||
| { | |||
| "name": "rust-analyzer", | |||
| "displayName": "rust-analyzer", | |||
| "description": "A language server for the rust programming language", | |||
| "description": "The future of Rust support in VSCode.", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also the present hopefully 😅,
(I'm worried this sounds too much like "experimental")
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah I don't know, maybe someone has a nicer description 😄 I guess we could also go for something more 'boring', but I felt this helps a bit more to differentiate this extension from rust-lang.rust
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The New and Improved Rust extension!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd just say "Rust language support for Visual Studio Code". And the rust-lang.rust one should say "use the other one!"
editors/code/package.json
Outdated
| @@ -1,15 +1,15 @@ | |||
| { | |||
| "name": "rust-analyzer", | |||
| "displayName": "rust-analyzer", | |||
| "description": "A language server for the rust programming language", | |||
| "description": "The future of Rust support in VSCode.", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd just say "Rust language support for Visual Studio Code". And the rust-lang.rust one should say "use the other one!"
| @@ -1,15 +1,15 @@ | |||
| { | |||
| "name": "rust-analyzer", | |||
| "displayName": "rust-analyzer", | |||
| "description": "A language server for the rust programming language", | |||
| "description": "The future of Rust support in VSCode.", | |||
| "preview": true, | |||
| "private": true, | |||
| "icon": "icon.png", | |||
| "version": "0.4.0-dev", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We probably want to fix the version generating code?
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 3dcf9e0 has been approved by |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
No description provided.