Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-fix the help command's implementation #1425

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 16, 2015

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This was accidentally broken in a recent refactoring.

Closes #1421

This was accidentally broken in a recent refactoring.

Closes rust-lang#1421
@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @huonw

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@huonw
Copy link
Member

huonw commented Mar 16, 2015

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 16, 2015

@bors r=huonw 2ff5f53

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 16, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 2ff5f53 with merge e689383...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2015
This was accidentally broken in a recent refactoring.

Closes #1421
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 16, 2015

💔 Test failed - cargo-mac-32

@huonw
Copy link
Member

huonw commented Mar 16, 2015

@bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 16, 2015

⚡ Previous build results for cargo-linux-32, cargo-linux-64, cargo-mac-64 are reusable. Rebuilding only cargo-mac-32, cargo-win-32, cargo-win-64...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 16, 2015

💔 Test failed - cargo-mac-32

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: retry

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:04 AM, bors notifications@github.com wrote:

[image: 💔] Test failed - cargo-mac-32
http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/cargo-mac-32/builds/1011


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1425 (comment).

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 16, 2015

⚡ Previous build results for cargo-linux-32, cargo-linux-64, cargo-mac-64, cargo-win-32, cargo-win-64 are reusable. Rebuilding only cargo-mac-32...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 16, 2015

☀️ Test successful - cargo-linux-32, cargo-linux-64, cargo-mac-32, cargo-mac-64, cargo-win-32, cargo-win-64

@bors bors merged commit 2ff5f53 into rust-lang:master Mar 16, 2015
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the issue-1421 branch March 16, 2015 17:12
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2025
…15245)

### What does this PR try to resolve?

GitHub Runner Images 20250224.5.0+ ship Windows 11 SDK 10.0.26100+
compared to the previous Windows 11 SDK 10.0.22621, which bumped the
UCRT headers. The new UCRT headers use SSE2 types. However, `cc`
versions <= 1.2.15 emit `/arch:IA32` for `x86` Windows targets for
`clang-cl`, which causes compilation errors since `clang-cl` can't find
SSE2 types without `/arch:SSE2` specified (or defaulted). (Note that
MSVC at the time of writing silently accepts and emits instruments for
code using SSE2 types, as opposed to `clang-cl` hard error-ing).

`cc` 1.2.16 contains a fix for this problem,
rust-lang/cc-rs#1425, to correctly emit
`/arch:SSE2` instead of `/arch:IA32` to enable `clang-cl` to find the
SSE2 types. However, cargo's `cc` currently is still on 1.2.13.

To fix this for rust-lang/rust CI, we need to bump anything that
transitively relies on `cc` and tries to use `clang-cl` on `x86` Windows
targets to compile any C/C++ code that transitively use functions or
types that require SSE2 types, such as `<wchar.h>`.

### How should we test and review this PR?

The fix was initially intended for `rustc_{codegen_ssa,llvm}` `cc`, and
based on testing in rust-lang/rust#137724, I was
able to successfully build `rustc_{codegen_ssa,llvm}` with a forked `cc`
based on 1.2.15 which contains the fix from
rust-lang/cc-rs#1425. Note that in the same PR,
while the compiler build succeeded, the build of cargo itself failed
since it transitively used a `cc` *without* the fix to build
`curl-sys`[^dep-chain], which failed as one might expect (`curl-sys`
tries to build C code that uses `<wchar.h>` which runs into the same
problem). Hence, this PR is opened to bump cargo's `cc` to a `cc`
version containing the fix.

### Additional information

This `x86` Windows CI problem is:

- Discussed in
https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/242791-t-infra/topic/spurious.20.28.3F.29.20i686.20msvc.20errors.
- Tracked by rust-lang/rust#137733.

#### `cc` changelog between 1.2.13 and 1.2.16

<details>
<summary>`cc` changes since 1.2.13 up to and including 1.2.16</summary>

#####
[1.2.16](rust-lang/cc-rs@cc-v1.2.15...cc-v1.2.16)
- 2025-02-28

###### Fixed

- force windows compiler to run in `out_dir` to prevent artifacts in cwd
(#1415)

###### Other

- use `/arch:SSE2` for `x86` target arch (#1425)
- Regenerate windows-sys binding
([#1422](rust-lang/cc-rs#1422))
- Regenerate target info
([#1418](rust-lang/cc-rs#1418))
- Add LIB var when compiling flag_check (#1417)
- Change flag ordering
([#1403](rust-lang/cc-rs#1403))
- Fix archiver detection for musl cross compilation
([#1404](rust-lang/cc-rs#1404))

#####
[1.2.15](rust-lang/cc-rs@cc-v1.2.14...cc-v1.2.15)
- 2025-02-21

###### Other

- Regenerate target info
([#1406](rust-lang/cc-rs#1406))
- Always read from all `CFLAGS`-style flags
([#1401](rust-lang/cc-rs#1401))
- Simplify the error output on failed `Command` invocation
([#1397](rust-lang/cc-rs#1397))

#####
[1.2.14](rust-lang/cc-rs@cc-v1.2.13...cc-v1.2.14)
- 2025-02-14

###### Other

- Regenerate target info
([#1398](rust-lang/cc-rs#1398))
- Add support for setting `-gdwarf-{version}` based on RUSTFLAGS
([#1395](rust-lang/cc-rs#1395))
- Add support for alternative network stack io-sock on QNX 7.1 aarch64
and x86_64 ([#1312](rust-lang/cc-rs#1312))

</details>

[^dep-chain]: I think the dep chain is something like git2 ->
libgit2-sys -> curl -> curl-sys?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Misleading instructions on how to get help via cargo help
4 participants