Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(schema): Use ExecutionSchema from galileo-core #90

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 2, 2024

Conversation

setu4993
Copy link
Member

Use types straight from galileo-core. Goes after https://github.com/rungalileo/core/pull/110.

@setu4993 setu4993 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 30, 2024 01:29
@setu4993 setu4993 requested a review from quinn-galileo July 30, 2024 01:29
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (754b2c2) to head (a4b78ed).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #90   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines            9         9           
=========================================
  Hits             9         9           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@setu4993 setu4993 force-pushed the fix/protect/status branch from ad41758 to 909ce09 Compare July 30, 2024 18:13
@setu4993 setu4993 changed the title fix(schema): Use ExecutionSchema from galileo-core refactor(schema): Use ExecutionSchema from galileo-core Jul 30, 2024
@setu4993 setu4993 merged commit 2554e9b into main Aug 2, 2024
9 checks passed
@setu4993 setu4993 deleted the fix/protect/status branch August 2, 2024 19:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants