Attempt to fix required properties for nested attributes #31
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This PR can be merged as well. I resolved conflicts but Github hasn't picked them up yet |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There is another bug:
required: trueis not supported for nested attributes. I added test case but have no idea how to fix it.It seems there is a flaw in design: there is part in
grape-swaggerthat wraps entity and addsrequiredkey along withproperties. But if an attribute is nested, thengrape-swagger-entitywraps it with the same structure asgrape-swagger, but without required.Both gems does the same job, and it feels wrong