Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add RCLCPP_PUBLIC to Context constructor #167

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2015
Merged

Conversation

jacquelinekay
Copy link
Contributor

Potential fix for currently broken Windows build.

I use a local Context in the multithreaded test, to make sure the IntraProcessManager gets cleaned up between test cases.

The Context constructor does not use the RCLCPP_PUBLIC macro.

I believe we previously didn't test this constructor anywhere in user code.

@jacquelinekay jacquelinekay added the in progress Actively being worked on (Kanban column) label Dec 3, 2015
@jacquelinekay jacquelinekay self-assigned this Dec 3, 2015
@jacquelinekay jacquelinekay added in review Waiting for review (Kanban column) and removed in progress Actively being worked on (Kanban column) labels Dec 3, 2015
@jacquelinekay
Copy link
Contributor Author

@wjwwood
Copy link
Member

wjwwood commented Dec 3, 2015

+1 for the approach of the fix.

@esteve
Copy link
Member

esteve commented Dec 3, 2015

+1 if the CI job passes.

@dirk-thomas
Copy link
Member

The build passed.

dirk-thomas added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2015
Add RCLCPP_PUBLIC to Context constructor
@dirk-thomas dirk-thomas merged commit 13d36a1 into master Dec 3, 2015
@dirk-thomas dirk-thomas removed the in review Waiting for review (Kanban column) label Dec 3, 2015
@dirk-thomas dirk-thomas deleted the fix_windows_context branch December 3, 2015 20:18
nnmm pushed a commit to ApexAI/rclcpp that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2022
update style to match latest uncrustify
DensoADAS pushed a commit to DensoADAS/rclcpp that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2022
Signed-off-by: Dirk Thomas <dirk-thomas@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants